Article Type : Case Report
Authors : Tomohisa K
Keywords : Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Renal cyst; ANCA- associated vasculitis (AAV)
ANCA- Associated Vasculitis (AAV) is a multi-system
immune small vessel vasculitis. The use of traditional immunosuppressive agents
in the management of ANCA vasculitis is known to increase baseline
susceptibility to malignancy [1]. Renal cyst is a commonly encountered
incidental finding in clinical practice. Although most cysts found are benign,
the identification of complex cysts warrants further diagnostic investigation
to exclude a neoplastic process. To shed light on this complex area, the
Bosniak system has provided a framework for the classification of cystic renal
lesions. The system defines five categories of renal lesions based on
radiological features seen on CT or MRI, to stratify the lesions associated
risk of malignancy [2]. We describe a case of ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV)
in a patient with the dilemma of a superimposed malignancy risk due an
incidental finding of complex renal cysts. We describe eighteen months of
follow up of this case managed using Rituximab guided by malignancy risk
stratification.
A previously healthy 47-year-old male was referred
urgently to the renal department with a recent decline in kidney function,
which was previously normal. Initial laboratory results revelated a creatinine
of 183 umol/l, haemoglobin of 97 g/l and an MPO ANCA titre of > 221.9 iu/ml.
When seen in the clinic he described reduced appetite, with 2 stone of weight
loss over 1 month. His physical exam was unremarkable. Given his reduced renal
function, he had an urgent renal biopsy which showed focal segmental necrotising
glomerulonephritis with a single cellular crescent in keeping with ANCA
associated vasculitis. However, two complex renal cysts were seen on ultrasound
in his right kidney (Figure 1) and until malignancy was ruled out it was
decided to treat with steroid monotherapy (prednisolone), not with
cyclophosphamide. Initial response to this appeared to be effective, reducing
creatinine from 214 to 126 umol/l. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was carried
out to investigate the aetiology of the observed cysts (Figure 2). Cyst images
reviewed by the urology and radiology MDT and the conclusion was that the cysts
were of a Bosniak IIF grade with no current evidence of malignancy. The MDT
recommended follow up of the renal cysts after 6 months and every year thereafter.
Given the risk of malignancy-risk associated with Bosniak IIF grading,
rituximab was commenced over cyclophosphamide.
This case report describes the treatment of AAV in a patient with an underlying superimposed malignancy risk, 2 complex renal cysts. A classification of Bosniak IIF cyst carries a ~5% (0-25%) per year risk of malignant transformation and therefore warrants additional follow-up and treatment considerations [3]. The patient has completed one and a half years (18 months) on vasculitis treatment with steroid and rituximab. His creatinine normalized to 90 umol/l, MPO became negative (Figures 3,4) and the last CT follow up did not show any change in the renal cyst.
Figure 1: Ultrasound with contrast right kidney showing 2 complex cysts located in the anterior cortex. There is a 3.5 cm cystic lesion with focal echogenic area measuring 1.8 cm. There is a second complex cyst measuring 3.5 cm close to the posterior mid renal cortical lip. This second cyst has a slightly irregular border and central echogenic complex septi.
Figure 2: MRI both kidneys T1 signal (Top) and T2 signal
(Bottom). The more anterior cyst contains an area of T1 high signal posteriorly
which does not enhance appreciably and would be consistent with proteinaceous/haemorrhagic
debris. The more posterior lesion demonstrates multiple septations.
Figure 3: Kidney function response to Steroid and Rituximab treatment between January 2019 and June 2020.
Figure 4: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Titer in response to vasculitis treatment between January 2019 and June 2020.
He is due for his next follow up CT one year. In a search beyond traditional treatment
protocols, two randomised control trials in the last 10 years have demonstrated
clinical efficacy of rituximab vs cyclophosphamide in AAV (RAVE4and RITUXVAS)
[4,5]. These RTCs have encouraged clinicians to use rituximab in both inducing
remission and maintenance therapy of AAV. Following these promising studies,
NICE guideline [TA308] published in 2014, included specific recommendations for
the use of rituximab over cyclophosphamide in AAV [6]. The guideline focused on
using rituximab after relapse following cyclophosphamide treatment, exceeding
the maximum cyclophosphamide dose, or a history of uroepithelial malignancy.
As well as demonstrating clinical efficacy, the NICE
guideline reflects the favourable side effect profile associated with
rituximab. Van Daalen et al., followed 323 patients over 5.3 years to assess
the malignancy risk of cyclophosphamide vs rituximab [1]. The study
demonstrated that the incidence of malignancy was 4.61 fold higher (95% CI 1.16
to 39.98) in cyclophosphamide-treated patients than in rituximab-treated
patients. Notably, the use of maintenance rituximab treatment has not been
associated with an increased malignancy risk compared with the general
population (0.67; 95% CI 0.08 to 2.43). In the presence of an incidental renal
cyst, the Bosniak system provides a validated method of quantifying the risk of
malignant transformation. NICE guideline does not address the use of rituximab
with co-morbidities that increase underlying risk of malignancy, but for
ethical reasons, this area should remain an active consideration for
clinicians. Despite this the Bosniak system has limitations, the interpretation
of grading remains subject to intra-observer agreement, especially IIF to III
lesions, which may carry variable rates of malignant transformation (5% vs 50%,
respectively) [7]. Despite these issues, due to the associated baseline
malignancy risk associated with IIF renal cyst the choice of immunosuppressive
agent in AAV should be evaluated by the treating clinicians.
Rituximab, in this case, was an efficacious and safe
immunosuppressive choice in managing this vasculitis patient with an underlying
risk of progression to malignancy. It could be a good alternative to
cyclophosphamide in cases with a high risk of malignancy. Using risk
stratification tools like the Bosniak classification system in this case can
guide case-specific treatment decisions for immunosuppressive therapy in AAV.