Article Type : Case Report
Authors : Gomathi P and Arulmurugan B
Keywords : Ovarian ectopic pregnancy; Hemorrhagic cyst; Corpus luteum cyst
Ovarian ectopic pregnancy is a rare
variant of ectopic implantation. It ends with rupture before the end of the
first trimester. Ovarian ectopic pregnancy incidence after natural conception
ranges from 1 in 2000 to 1 in 60 000 deliveries and accounts for 3% of all
ectopic pregnancies [1]. Ultrasound criteria are difficult as findings are
typically a cystic ovarian mass, with a differential of corpus luteum cyst,
hemorrhagic cyst, and tubal ectopic pregnancy. Many women with ovarian
pregnancies are believed to have a ruptured corpus luteum cyst, and the correct
diagnosis was made during the surgical procedure only 28% of the time. The
hemorrhagic mass (ovarian ectopic) should be located adjacent to the corpus
luteum, never within it. Ovarian pregnancy is also associated with profuse
hemorrhage, with 81% of reported to have a hemoperitoneum greater than 500 mL
[2].
A 34 yrs old patient G9P2L1A6 presented with positive
pregnancy test, she had recurrent pregnancy loss which she was not evaluated in
her home country and never had ectopic before, she had 2 vaginal deliveries, antenatal
booking tests were normal except haemoglobin
which was 10.4, ultrasound done to check for the viability at 6 weeks as
she had multiple miscarriages. Radiologist did the scan diagnosed to have right
ovarian ectopic with cardiac pulsation and corpus luteum is seen adjacent to it
with mild fluid in haemoperitoneum, beta HCG was 5050 at diagnosis. After
getting informed written consent posted for laparoscopy and right ovarian
ectopic confirmed laparoscopically it was on the verge of rupture, proceeded
with the resection of ectopic from the ovary with harmonic scalpel and the
haemostasis achieved by suturing the ovarian tissue with 2-0 vicryl.
Intraoperative and post-operative period was uneventful.80 mg of methotrexate
given post operatively as there was a possibility of remnant ectopic tissue in
the ovary, beta HCG reduced to 563 miu/ml 2 days of post operatively (Figure
1).
Pathophysiology of ovarian ectopic pregnancy is not clear [3]. There are various hypotheses such as:
Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain ovarian
implantation. One theory suggests that fertilization occurs normally and
implantation on the ovary follows reflux of the conceptus from the tube. Reverse
migration of an embryo towards the Fallopian tube and implantation on the
ipsilateral or contralateral ovary are also supported by the occurrence of
ovarian pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. According
to the second theory, various disturbances in ovum release are responsible for
ovarian implantation. Chorionic villi (arrowheads) within the cavity of the
follicular rupture [4]. Alternatively, fertilization of an extruded ovum which
remains adherent to the ovarian stigma may occur, by implantation into its own
ruptured follicle or parts of the ovarian tissue. Second mechanism probably
better explains the cases of intrafollicular and special categories of
extrafollicular pregnancy (interstitial and cortical). Predisposing factors
thought to be pelvic inflammatory disease the possible (especially previous
oophoritis) or an intrauterine device. Though the clinical presentation of
bleeding, abdominal pain, and positive pregnancy test is similar, ovarian
pregnancy is usually not associated with PID, infertility, or tubal disease
like other ectopic pregnancies. The pathology diagnostic criteria were
described in 1878 by Spiegelberg.
Both sonographically and at the time of surgery the
clinical challenge is to distinguish an ovarian ectopic pregnancy from a corpus
luteum or hemorrhagic cyst , because a cystic adnexal mass with a positive
pregnancy test without clear intrauterine gestation could also indicate a
corpus luteum in an early or failing intrauterine or tubal pregnancy. Decreased
wall echogenicity compared with the endometrium and an anechoic texture suggest
a corpus luteum. Color or spectral Doppler sonography does not seem to fulfill
additional diagnostic expectations, yet Atriv [5] found that a resistive index
of less than 0.39 had a specificity of 100% and a positive predictive value of
100% for diagnosing ectopic pregnancy but was present in only 15% of ectopic
pregnancies. He concluded that both low and high resistive indices discriminate
ectopic pregnancy from a corpus luteum cyst. Rare ovarian pregnancies can be
treated by laparoscopic surgical excision. Many times this occurs when the
expected surgery is for a ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy or hemorrhagic
corpus luteum. The surgical treatment alternatives include an ovarian wedge
resection or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, the latter of which should be
avoided and does not improve the subsequent pregnancy rate or lower the risk of
recurrence [6,7].
With careful clinical evaluation and transvaginal examination
early staged ovarian ectopic cases can be treated conservatively which
preserves the normal anatomy crucial for fertility.