Article Type : Short commentary
Authors : Levintov A
Keywords : City University; Small university; Education; Professional\vocational training; Science
The history of the formation of urban universities is
traced, including the modern and promising stages of this history, the role of
the most important processes: education, vocational training and scientific
research. The functional and genetic typology of small universities is
presented, as well as a diagram of the place of these universities in the
process and flow of social development.
The vast majority of universities arose as small ones (with the exception of such examples as Stanford), for the needs of cities (medicine, commerce, law) and as an intellectual guarantee of the sovereignty of urban communes and municipalities. Science as an independent sphere was formed in universities in the 16th and 17th centuries as an intellectual force excessive for these cities (Table 1).
The peak of the genesis of universities in Europe occurred in the 16th century, which formed the basis for the origin and development of science. It took decades and even centuries for university education to become a noticeable social phenomenon, the number of educated people reached a certain point of crystallization of rather random activities into scientific activities, methodologically designed and gained authority. The war of town contra gown, "the city against the mantle", ended with a convincing victory for education and science.
At the same time, cities, in conditions of an almost
unchanged socio-cultural situation, could quite articulately submit a request
for certain professions, while only universities themselves, elite "city
fathers", as well as the highest nobility and clergy could formulate an
educational request. In this regard, the early history of Moscow University is
instructive and indicative. It should be recalled that Moscow University opened
on January 25, 1755 in one of the rooms of the pharmacy at the Iversky Gate at
11 students. In 1809 (Speransky's educational reform), half a century later,
two faculties of the Moscow Imperial University, Medical (Medical, 248
students) and Law (Political, 222 students), focused on professional training,
and the other two, Mathematical (natural sciences – physics, chemistry,
biology, geography, etc.) are concentrated here - 37 students and Literature -
153 students have a general educational character. Nevertheless, the task of
forming "centaurs" - educated professionals as an intellectual elite
- was urgent for Europe, Russia, and the United States. Unfortunately, in our
country we have gone through and continue to go through so many reforms,
transformations, perestroika and reshaping of education, including university
education, that we have completely lost the fundamental, conceptual differences
between education and vocational training, which neither at the student level,
nor at the teacher level, nor at the public and state level, we can no longer
articulate, what we do in universities.
The current stage of university development is
reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities,
mostly ephemeral.
The current stage of university development is
reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities,
mostly ephemeral.
The development of small universities can be
characterized by a number of stages in their life cycle:
The current stage of university development is reminiscent of the middle Ages: we are witnessing a boom of small universities, mostly ephemeral.
1. The
emergence of an educational idea or the emergence/consciousness of an
educational request/target group.
2. Formation
of the content of education based on the educational idea itself, opportunities
and request of participants and target audience. At this stage there is
formation of norms of activity, fixation of values and organizational
structures of the university.
3. Presumably,
small universities, having passed the stage of formalization of educational
content and internal structure, can develop variably:
· in this state they can
function for a long time, working for their target group;
· may be transformed in the
future into another organization, including a state educational institution or
an institution of additional education, if this was not done initially, or
become part of another educational structure;
· Can end its existence if
the educational request has been fulfilled, and the leader and his followers
are absent at the moment.
The logic of development of small universities as a
mobile academic community of professionals and learners seems to be as follows:
from the realization of the educational idea and acquisition of the target
group through the development of content and internal structure to a new status
or liquidation.
In the framework of the study “Small University” [3] a
functional-genetic typology of small universities was developed:
The functional-genetic typology is not exhaustive, but
it sets a conceptual space for describing all possible variants of small and
urban universities. For a more complete description it is necessary to
introduce a historical vector: the already past real history of the university
and the upcoming alternative perspectives.
However, not all types of universities are real:
Possible functional and genetic types of mini-universities (Table 3).
Thus, out of 36 theoretically possible, only 13 are
actually possible, but they create a rather motley and complex picture of small
universities.
The theoretical model of a small university can be
formulated in the following scheme (Figure1):
One of the results of social development is a set of
required and or promising professions, the most important factor of social
development is the educational frontier.
Modern small universities differ from their
predecessors in conceptuality - the elaboration and detail of their concept,
from which unfolds the organizational project of the university and its basic
processes: scientific and project activities, educational and professional
training. In general, the concept can be presented as follows (of course, each
concept is unique in content) [3] (Figure 2).
As an example, the concept of the Invisible University
is proposed, targeting residents of Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees in Europe
[2]. This concept was proposed in October 2023.
Here are some episodes of world history: The 16th
century, the “Little Glaciation” in Europe (84 bad and unproductive years) and
- the heyday of European universities, Galileo, Durer, Bruno, Kepler, da Vinci,
Copernicus, Nostradamus, Paracelsus, Brahe, Hobbes, Comenius: what a pleiad!
·
The Great Depression -
and decisive advances in science, engineering and education: nuclear physics,
radio engineering, television, aviation, biology and agronomy, technical
universities and institutes in Europe, USA and USSR.
·
40s (World War II) –
breakthrough in the military-industrial complex and in engineering and officer education,
emergence of adult schools for pensioners and schools for the adaptation of
World War II veterans in Great Britain and the USA.
·
the deepest crisis of the
90s in Russia and the former USSR countries – and the formation of new networks
of universities, the emergence of a “second breath” in education, the
restructuring of the entire system and organization of science.
The theory “economic crisis and war is an educational boom” is verified by the course of all new and recent history.
Table 1: Dynamics of the formation of a network of European universities.
Century |
Number |
Universities |
11 |
2 |
Bologna (1088), Oxford (1096) |
12 |
1 |
Modena (1175) |
13 |
19 |
Paris-Sorbonne (early 13), Montpellier
(early 13), Cambridge (1209), Valencia (1212), Arezzo (1215), Salamanca
(1218), Padua (1222), Naples (1224), Toulouse (1229), Salerno (1231), Orleans
(1235), Valladolid (1241), Siena (1246), Remuer (1250), Murcia (1272),
Macerata (1290), Lisbon (1290), Madrid (1293), Leda (1300) |
14 |
24 |
Avignon (1303), Rome (1303), Coimbra
(1308), Perugia (1308), Cahors (1332), Camerino (1336), Grenoble (1339), Pisa
(1343), Prague-Charles (1347), Florence (1349), Perpignan (1350), Huesca
(1354), Pavia (1361), Krakow (1364), Orange (1365), Vienna (1365), Pest
(1367), Lucca (1369), Heidelberg (1386), Cologne (1388), Erfurt (1389),
Ferrara (1391), Budapest (1395), Zadar (1396) |
15 |
39 |
Wurzburg (1402), Turin (1404), Leipzig
(1409), Aix-en-Provence (1409), Parma (1412), St. Andrews (1413), Rostock
(1419), Allocat (1422), Leuven (1425), Pointy (1431), Cayenne (1432), Catania
(1434), Bordeaux (1441), Barcelona (1450), Glasgow (1451), Valence (1452),
Istanbul (1453), Trier (1454), Greifswald (1456), Freiburg (1457), Basel
(1459), Ingolstadt (1459), Nantes (1460), Bourges (1464), Bratislava (1465),
Venice (1470), Genoa (1471), Zaragoza (1474), Mainz (1476), Tubingen (1476),
Uppsala (1477), Copenhagen 1479), Palma de Mallorca (1483), Siguenza (1489),
Aberdeen (1495), Frankfurt an der Oder (1498), Alcala de Henares (1499),
Valencia (1500) |
16 |
64 |
Wittenberg (1502), Seville (1505),
Frankfurt (1506), Seville-Santa Tomas (1516), Toledo (1521), Santiago de
Compastela (1526), Marburg (1527), Granada (1531), Sahagun (1534), Lausanne
(1537), Nims (1539), Maserata (1540), Onyate (1540), Baeza (1542),
Koenigsberg (1544), Gandia (1547), Reims (1548), Messina (1548), Tournon
(1548), Osuna (1548), Irache (1550), Almagro (1550), Tortosa (1551),
Orihuella (1552), Dillingen (1553), Burgo de Osma (1555), Milan (1556),
Prague-Clementinum (1556), Rome– Gregorian (1556), Jena (1557), Evora (1558),
Geneva (1559), Pasmal (1559), Douai (1559), Mondovi (1560), Ancona (1562),
Estella (1565), Braunsberg (1568), Olomouc (1570), Pont-a-Monsoon (1572),
Oviedo (1574), Tarragona (1574), Leiden (1575), Helmsted (1575), Avila
(1576), Rome-Angelicum (1577), Palermo (1578), Vilnius (1579), Cluj (1581),
Edinburgh (1582), Orthez (1583), Fermo (1585), Franeker (1585), Graz (1585),
Escorial (1587), Girona (1587), Malta (1592), Dublin (1592), Marischal
(1593), Zamosch (1594), Saumur (1596), Montauban (1598), Vic (1599), Sedan
(1599) |
17 |
38 |
Dee (1601), Royal Bourbon
College (1603), Giessen (1607), Groningen (1612), Colson (1614), Palerborn
(1614), Sassari (1617), Molsheim (1617), Pamplona (1619), Rinteln (1620),
Salzburg (1620), Sagliari (1620), Strasbourg (1621), Altdorf (1622), Mantua
(1625), Ostabrück (1629), Tartu (1632), Kessel (1633), Trnava (1635), Utrecht
(1636), Turku (1640), Hardervik (1647), Bamberg (1648), Kiel (1652), Duisburg
(1654), Nijmegen (1665), Kosice (1657), Lemberg (1661), Presov (1665), Lund
(1668), Innsbruck (1668), Zagreb (1669), Urbino (1671), Montbellard (1671),
Linz (1674), Strasbourg (1685), Besancon (1691), Halle (1693) |
18 |
28 |
La Laguna (1701), Breslau (1702),
Charite (1710), Cervera (1714), Dijon (1722), Pau (1722), St. Petersburg
(1724), Camerino (1727), Fulda (1732), Gottingen (1733), Rennes (1735),
Ergangen (1742), Braunschweig (1745), Altamura (1748), Moscow (1755), Byutzov
(1760), Korte (1765), Freiberg (1765), Nancy (1768), Malta (1769), Berlin
(1770), Munster 91771), Modena (1772), Istanbul Technical University (1773),
Clausthal (1775), Bonn (1777), Stuttgart (1781), Budapest University of
Technology and Economics (1782) |
Table 2: Functional-genetic typology of mini-universities.
Function Initiative |
Enlighten Ment |
Education |
Professional Training |
Social |
Spiritual
|
Poli- Functional University |
State
Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Confessional Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public
Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Initiative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function Initiative |
Enlighten Ment |
Education |
Professional Training |
Social |
Spiritual
|
Poli- Functional University |
State Initiative |
Universities of
penicirate and correctional system
|
|
|
|
||
Municipal Initiative |
Overcoming the
katakombic and slum bottom of the poorest neighborhoods
|
Entrepre neurship develop ment
|
Creativity develop ment
|
Intellectual
development of new and revitalized settlements and territories
|
||
Confessional Initiative |
|
|
|
Formation of a new
image of urban and local life |
Missionary Activities
|
Monastic universities
|
Business Initiative |
|
|
Micro-adjustment of
professions ephemeral universities
in the transition from one cycle of corporate life to another |
|
|
|
Public Initiative |
Intellectual support
for immigrants, refugees and guest workers ensuring their
intellectual advancement |
Formation of
ethno-cultural communities, enclaves and minorities
|
|
|||
Private Initiative |
|
|
|
|
University-Legacy
|
Named
Universities |
The welfare, well-being and happiness of any nation
and any country are based not on favorable natural conditions and wealth of
natural resources, but on the diligence of people, on the level and quality of
their education.
In the conditions of war and growing totalitarianism,
the university, like the University of Jamnia at the time of the Jewish War,
must be compact to the point of miniaturization and ephemeral (=have a mission
fulfilled by one generation and shorter) - that is why it has spontaneously
acquired the name of Invisible, above all for the state machine and repressive
state constraints (border, legislation, management and control systems,
institution and education system). It is useless and dangerous to fight the
state - it is necessary to create and exist in a parallel reality, without
touching state interests and foundations.
The Invisible University is virtual and exists in the
Internet space. It is quite open (access to it is by recommendation, invitation
or self-application with the presentation of intellectual identification), but
it is not a passageway for everyone.
· The University is not
accredited anywhere and retains its sovereignty.
· The university operates programmatically, in agile technology: topics and forms of work change as participant’s progress.
The last statement of the concept means, among other things, that ontologically the concept can change as it is realized and as the university itself matures:
· Instead of departments
and faculties there are workshops (educational structures) and laboratories
(design and research structures)
· There appeared a
procedure for introducing new participants, very reminiscent of the procedure
for inviting and recommending them to a club.
· The idea of diplomas - for
graduates of workshops who completed final assignments, certificates for
graduates of laboratories who completed individual or group final assignments,
and certificates of participation - for all others.
The modern era can be characterized as a time of
public confusion and disorientation. We find ourselves at a crossroads and will
not choose a mainstream, moreover, we even seem to have accepted the fact that
we are moving in different directions and are now unlikely to meet the people
with whom we started the road to the future. This means, among other things,
that the wave of new universities will be represented mainly by compact and
ephemeral organizations, where the main results will be research and projects,
and professional training and education will be optional extras. Actually,
these new universities will become the motors of urban and social development,
the main content of urban and social life. Moreover, not only the appearance of
cities, their layout and functions are changing, but also the ontology of the
city and its place in the system of intellectual communications and
organization of space in the Oikumene are changing. Cities are no longer a
clutter of people, architecture and infrastructures, they are more and more
centers of generation of ideas, projects and other intellectual products.