Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Weimer LE, Cattari G, Fanales Belasio E, Cuccuru E and Vidili Gianpaolo
Keywords : SARS-CoV-2; Covid-19
Over four years have passed since the beginning of the most significant health challenge in the 21st century has been the Sars-Cov-2. The extensive research and the Global Cooperation response has been rapid and effective with the profound understanding of fundamental biological and molecular characteristic of Covid-19 and many therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and small molecules developed for clinical use. The effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has been questioned because the virus and its variants have changed over time. This technical note highlights the need to assess the antiviral activity of these antibodies against new variants and adapt treatment strategies accordingly. Pre-exposure prophylaxis using the latest monoclonal antibodies is one complementary preventative therapy to reduce severity of breakthrough Sars-Cov-2 in vulnerable persons with severe immunocompromise due organ transplant, cancer, HIV or use of certain medications experience diminished Covid-19 vaccine immune response and remain at higher risk for severe Sars-Cov-2 outcomes ; across many studies, Monoclonal Antibodies Pre-Exposure is associated with a 60% to 80% reduction in severe COVID-19 outcomes. Covid-19 variants evolution, however, leads to viral mutations that can evade Monoclonal Antibodies due to the selective nature of their binding sites. Several Monoclonal Antibodies that received FDA emergency use authorization for prevention of Sars-Cov-2 have since had this authorization revoked once circulating variants demonstrated immune evasion.
Over five years have passed since
the beginning of the most significant health challenge in the 21st
century has been the Sars-Cov-2. As of January 2025, monoclonal antibodies for
treating immunocompromised patients with the Neus Variants of Sars-Cov-2
(especially those with comorbidities) have evolved significantly since the
early pandemic stages. However, newer treatments may still be under
investigation or regulatory review. The extensive research and the Global
Cooperation response has been rapid and effective with the profound understanding of fundamental
biological and molecular characteristic of Covid-19 and many therapeutic
monoclonal antibodies and small molecules developed for clinical use [1].
The effectiveness of monoclonal
antibodies has been questioned because the virus and its variants have changed
over time. This technical note highlights the need to assess the antiviral
activity of these antibodies against new variants and adapt treatment
strategies accordingly.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis using the
latest monoclonal antibodies is one complementary preventative therapy to
reduce severity of breakthrough Sars-Cov-2 in vulnerable persons with severe
immunocompromise due organ transplant, cancer, HIV or use of certain medications
experience diminished Covid-19 vaccine immune response and remain at higher
risk for severe Sars-Cov-2 outcomes [2]; across many studies, Monoclonal
Antibodies Pre-Exposure is associated with a 60% to 80% reduction in severe
COVID-19 outcomes.
Covid-19 variants evolution,
however, leads to viral mutations that can evade Monoclonal Antibodies due to
the selective nature of their binding sites. Several Monoclonal Antibodies that
received FDA emergency use authorization for prevention of Sars-Cov-2 have
since had this authorization revoked once circulating variants demonstrated
immune evasion [3].
Introduction
Sars-Cov-2 still represents a
disproportionate risk for vulnerable patients, with infection often leading to
serious and protracted illness. Vaccination against Sars-Cov-2 has reduced in
the Word the burden Covid-19. The urgent need to find new therapeutic
strategies to combat the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic led to the design of numerous
anti-Covid 19 monoclonal antibody for Therapy and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for
the Latest Variants [4]. The immunocompromised persons and those who cannot be
vaccinated, remain at risk for severe Covid-19.
As the world deals with this
evolving threat, the narrative extends to the realm of emerging variants, each
displaying new mutations with implications that remain largely misunderstood.
Notably, the JN.1 Omicron lineage is gaining global prevalence, and early
findings suggest it stands among the immune-evading variants, a characteristic
attributed to its mutation L455S. Moreover, the detrimental consequences of the
novel emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages bear a particularly critical impact on
immunocompromised individuals and older adults. Immunocompromised individuals
face challenges such as suboptimal responses to COVID-19 vaccines, rendering
them more susceptible to severe disease. Similarly, older adults have an
increased risk of severe disease and the presence of comorbid conditions, find
themselves at a heightened vulnerability to develop COVID-19 disease. Thus, recognizing
these intricate factors is crucial for effectively tailoring public health
strategies to protect these vulnerable populations. In this context, this
review aims to describe, analyze, and discuss the current progress of the
next-generation treatments encompassing
the latest monoclonal antibodies for Pre-Exposure Therapy
immunotherapeutic approaches and advanced therapies emerging as complements
that will offer solutions to counter the disadvantages of the existing options.
Although Monoclonal Antibodies as
Prophilaxis and Therapy report efficacy as between 50-85% [5-6], global access
is currently largely inequitable. Preliminary outcomes show that these
strategies target the virus and address the immunomodulatory responses
associated with COVID-19. Furthermore, the capacity to promote tissue repair
has been demonstrated, which can be particularly noteworthy for
immunocompromised individuals who stand as vulnerable actors in the global
landscape of coronavirus infections [7-9].
Monoclonal antibodies, which
protect against disease irrespective of immune system status and provide rapid
protection, are potential options for Covid-19 immunoprophylaxis. Some
combinations of monoclonal antibodies are already in use through emergency or
temporary authorization for pre-exposure or post-exposure prophylaxis against
Covid-19 or treatment of mild-to-moderate disease.
The emerging next-generation
treatments possess broader potential, offering protection against a wide range
of variants and enhancing the ability to counter the impact of the constant
evolution of the virus. On the one hand, in vitro studies have suggested
reduced susceptibility of the latest variants to monoclonal antibodies, whereas
clinical data still show benefits in reducing severe illness and mortality,
indicating that laboratory results do not always mirror real-world outcomes. As
a result, although resistance to monoclonal antibodies can develop over time,
they could still have an important role in COVID-19 treatment, especially when
used in combination, and ongoing research aims to identify effective antibodies
against new variants. The main purpose of this literature Review is to
highlight the possible strategies to optimize and protect current and future
therapeutic options Pre-Exposure to treat the most vulnerable patients [10-11].
New Variants: "Almost a New Pandemic"
Because of the fast-evolving nature
of COVID-19 treatments and the emergence of new variants, the landscape for
monoclonal antibody therapies may have shifted. It is critical for healthcare
providers to stay updated on the most current guidance from agencies like the
FDA and the WHO, and to choose therapies based on the latest variant
prevalence, individual health conditions, and treatment availability.
With the emergence of this new
variants, the researchers realized that vaccination offered less protection and
that a third dose was needed to immunize the population. While previous
variants had fewer than ten mutations on the spike protein compared with the
original strain, Omicron had more than thirty. It was almost as if a new
pandemic had begun. What the researchers were less aware of was that Omicron
had a significant ability to evade monoclonal antibodies. This was demonstrated
by several scientists in an article published in December 2021. In their
research, the scientists showed that two thirds of the monoclonal antibodies
used in clinical practice or currently under development lost all their
antiviral activity against Omicron. The situation also became increasingly complex
as several sub variants (BA.1, BA.2, etc.) emerged over the following weeks. So
the scientists tried to determine whether the monoclonal antibodies were
effective against the new strains that were co-circulating. In a study
published in March 2022, they provided a number of answers. The
casirivimab/imdevimab combination, which until then had offered a similar level
of protection against severe forms of COVID-19 as vaccination, was no longer
active against Omicron. The neutralizing activity of another antibody cocktail
(tixagevimab/cilgavimab) was significantly reduced against BA.1 compared with
the Delta variant, but its neutralizing activity was not reduced nearly as much
against BA.2. This result, which showed that a monoclonal antibody could lose
its neutralizing capability for a given variant before recovering it for a
subsequent variant, emphasizes the importance of continuing with efficacy
testing on all available antibodies (Figure 1).
The protective efficacy of
monoclonal antibodies depends primarily, but not solely, on their neutralizing
capability. Some monoclonal antibodies can also induce a key immune defense
mechanism known as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), which kills
cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the case of COVID-19, natural killer (NK)
cells in the immune system recognize the antibodies that bind to antigens on
the surface of infected cells and then specifically lyse those cells. These
antibodies are described as "polyfunctional." This characteristic is
all the more interesting since the monoclonal antibodies with the highest
neutralizing capability are not those that induce ADCC the most, as shown in a
study published in December 2022. In short, to obtain protective antibody
cocktails, it may be a good idea to include polyfunctional antibodies which
combine a high neutralizing capability with a strong ability to induce immune
defense mechanisms [12].
Key Variants of Concern in December 2024
Omicron Sublineages (XBB family)
XBB.1
and XBB.1.5: These sublineages of
XBB have been circulating widely. XBB variants, including XBB.1 and its
sublineages, continue to show high levels of immune escape, meaning they can
evade immunity from previous infections or vaccinations to some extent. These
variants have been associated with reinfections in individuals who had
previously been exposed to COVID-19 or vaccinated.
XBB.2.75: This sublineage of XBB is also a major variant of
concern, with continued reports of immune evasion and increased
transmissibility compared to previous strains. The high number of mutations in
the spike protein and other regions make this subvariant a key focus for both
surveillance and vaccine updates [12,13].
BQ and BF Subvariants
BQ.1
and BQ.1.1: These are subvariants
of Omicron that have demonstrated increased transmissibility and partial
resistance to immunity from both previous infection and vaccines. They have
been circulating in various regions and remain a concern due to their ability
to evade neutralizing antibodies.
BF.7: Another important Omicron subvariant, which has
been noted for its ability to potentially escape immunity, though vaccines
still help protect against severe disease.
Monitoring of Emerging Variants
While Omicron remains the dominant
lineage, there are always potential for new subvariants or entirely new
variants to emerge, especially if mutations lead to more concerning traits,
such as:
·
Increased
transmissibility.
·
Higher
resistance to immunity from vaccines or past infections.
·
Potential to
cause more severe disease.
Health authorities like the WHO,
CDC, and other global and regional bodies continuously monitor for any
significant changes in the virus’s behavior. If new strains show signs of
increased transmissibility or a higher risk of severe outcomes, they may be
classified as Variants of Concern.
As of January 2025, monoclonal
antibodies for COVID-19 treatment, particularly for immunocompromised patients
and those with comorbidities, are still a key part of managing COVID-19 in
high-risk groups. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, especially Omicron
subvariants, has impacted the effectiveness of some earlier treatments, and
newer monoclonal antibody combinations are being investigated or deployed to
counteract immune evasion and improve outcomes for vulnerable patients.
Latest Monoclonal Antibodies and
Combinations (December 2024)
Evusheld
(AstraZeneca):
·
Components:
Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab.
·
Indication:
Evusheld is still widely used for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in
immunocompromised individuals who are unable to mount an adequate immune
response to vaccines. This includes people with conditions like cancer,
autoimmune diseases, or those on immunosuppressive therapies.
·
Effectiveness:
Though Evusheld has shown some diminished effectiveness against certain Omicron
subvariants (e.g., XBB and BQ/BF subvariants), it is still considered a
cornerstone in protecting vulnerable populations. Efforts to modify or enhance
its effectiveness are ongoing.
Bebtelovimab (Lilly):
·
Indication:
Bebtelovimab was used for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in high-risk
patients, including those who are immunocompromised, to prevent severe
outcomes. However, due to the emergence of newer Omicron subvariants with
mutations in the spike protein, Bebtelovimab has seen reduced effectiveness.
·
Status: It is
becoming less favored due to its reduced efficacy against Omicron subvariants,
but it may still be used in some contexts where other options are unavailable.
Combination of Monoclonal Antibodies (Emerging
Treatments):
·
New combinations
of monoclonal antibodies are being developed to provide broader protection
against immune-evading variants. These combinations are designed to target
multiple epitopes of the spike protein, reducing the chance of the virus
escaping the therapy due to mutations. Examples include:
·
Dual or Triple
Antibody Combinations: Research is ongoing to combine multiple monoclonal
antibodies that can bind to different parts of the spike protein or other
regions of the virus. These could provide better protection against the current
circulating Omicron subvariants.
·
Bamlanivimab and
Etesevimab (Eli Lilly): These were used as a combination treatment in the
earlier stages of the pandemic but have shown limited effectiveness against
recent Omicron variants, making them less commonly used today.
Long-Acting Antibodies for Prevention and Treatment:
·
Long-Acting
Monoclonal Antibodies (LAMAs): These therapies are being investigated to offer
longer-lasting protection against SARS-CoV-2, which is particularly beneficial
for those who cannot mount an effective immune response. The concept behind
these therapies is to provide extended immunity, which may be crucial for
immunocompromised individuals who cannot rely on vaccines alone.
Key Considerations for Immunocompromised
Patients
Variant-Specific Efficacy: The
effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has varied based on the circulating
variant of SARS-CoV-2. Omicron subvariants like XBB and BQ have shown the
potential to evade some antibodies designed for earlier strains. As a result,
new monoclonal antibodies or combinations are being developed to enhance
neutralizing activity against these newer variants.
Therapeutic vs. Prophylactic Use:
Some monoclonal antibodies, such as Evusheld, are used prophylactically (to
prevent infection), while others, like Bebtelovimab, have been used to treat
COVID-19 in the early stages of infection. The choice of therapy will depend on
the patient’s condition, the timing of infection, and the specific circulating
variants [13].
Combination Therapies
In some cases, monoclonal
antibodies are combined with antiviral medications (like Paxlovid) or other
supportive therapies to improve outcomes in immunocompromised patients. These
combinations may include:
·
Monoclonal
antibodies + Antiviral treatments (e.g., Paxlovid): This combination can reduce
viral load and prevent progression to severe disease, especially in high-risk
individuals.
·
Monoclonal
antibodies + Corticosteroids: For more severe cases, the combination of
monoclonal antibodies with corticosteroids (which reduce inflammation) is
sometimes used to manage severe COVID-19 infections.
Ongoing Research and Regulatory Approval
With the continuing evolution of
SARS-CoV-2, pharmaceutical companies and researchers are focusing on:
·
Broader spectrum
monoclonal antibodies: These would bind to various parts of the virus’s spike
protein or other regions, reducing the likelihood of immune escape.
·
Updated
monoclonal antibodies tailored to emerging Omicron subvariants like XBB and
BQ/BF, as these strains continue to circulate globally.
Patients Immunocompromised with comorbidity and Sars-Cov-2
(Emerging Treatments)
Individuals with immunosuppressed
conditions, including people with primary immunodeficiency’s and secondary
immunodeficiencies, consisting of people with solid-organ trans-plants,
metastatic cancers, hematologic malignancies, advanced or untreated HIV (human
immunodeficiency virus) infection, those receiving cancer chemotherapy, and
patients with autoimmune diseases receiving immunosuppressive biologics and
medications.
Patients in this heterogeneous
group had a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization, severe COVID-19,
or death and tend to have higher risk for opportunistic infections. In addition, prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and
persistent viral replication in ICP not only cause long duration of symptoms
but also risk of emergence of antiviral-resistant or vaccine-escaped variants,
prolonging the pandemic [14-20].
Although COVID-19 treatment
guidelines had been proposed to manage patients with different severities and
clinical cohorts, a consensus on COVID-19 patients in ICP was lacking and the
information was limited. Immunocompromised individuals are at higher risk of
severe COVID-19 outcomes. Vaccination remains a critical preventive mea-sure
for this vulnerable population. Although some may have a reduced response to
vaccines, receiving the recommended doses can still provide some level of
protection and potentially mitigate severe disease.
Given the potential for diminished
vaccine response, immunocompromised individuals should be considered for
booster doses based on local guidelines and emerging data. In cases of exposure to COVID-19,
immunocompromised individuals may require specific isolation or quarantine
measures, depending on their risk profile. The management of COVID-19 in ICP
necessitates an individualized approach. Clinicians must carefully consider the
patient's specific immunocompromised condition, medical history, and risk
factors to determine the most appropriate treatment plan. In severe COVID-19
cases among ICP, antiviral therapies such as remdesivir may be considered.
The decision to use antiviral drugs
should be based on clinical judgment and consultation with specialists from
multidisciplinary areas. In severe COVID-19 cases with significant inflammatory
responses, corticosteroids like dexamethasone may be used under close medical
supervision. The use of CCP therapy in specific severe cases of COVID-19 among
immunocompromised patients may be considered on a case-by-case basis early in
the pandemic. Therapeutic recommendations for antiviral or immunomodulation
therapy of adults with varying severities of COVID-19 are summarized in (Table
1).
Effectiveness of Monoclonal
Antibody-based therapy Against Covid Variants (January 2025)
Monoclonal antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2
S protein act through mechanisms related to their structure. First, the
antigen-binding fragments (Fab) prevent the virus from binding to the ACE2
receptors, and second, the Fc fragment can activate the complement system and
bind to the Immunoglobulin Fc receptors (FcRs) on cytotoxic cells that can
eliminate virus-infected cells through Ab-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity
(ADCC). Unfortunately, some mAbs can bind to macrophage FcRs and induce a
hyperinflammatory response resulting from Ab-dependent enhancement (ADE) of
cytokine production.
The SARS-CoV-2 RBD has become the
main target of mAbs because of its crucial role in virus entry into host cells
(Table 2). Analysis of the structural relationship between RBD and anti-RBD
NAbs has led to the classification of these antibodies according to structural
features and mechanism of action. Class 1 NAbs, e.g., CT-P59 (regdanvimab),
target the receptor binding motif (RBM). They recognize the RBD in the up
conformation, thus blocking the interaction with the ACE2 receptor. Class 2
NAbs, e.g. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab), target the ACE2 binding site of the RBD
in both up and down conformations. Class 3 antibodies, e.g., S309 (sotrovimab),
target the conserved core domain of the RBD without altering interactions with
the ACE2 receptor. Class 4 antibodies, e.g., S2X259, target epitopes in both
the RBM and the core domain of the RBD. Unfortunately, frequent mutations in
the RBD have modified the epitopes recognized by mAbs, resulting in the
emergence of viral variants resistant to mAbs. To address this issue,
researchers are exploring other SRS-CoV-2 regions as potential targets for
therapeutic mAbs.
Monoclonal Antibodies Aprovation as
Prophylaxis-Therapy in the Elderly and Immonocompromised Sars-Cov-2 population
at January 2025
Currently, most mAbs are
ineffective at providing an immune response to Omicron strains post BA.2.
Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration and provinces in Canada have
found tixagevimab plus cilgavimab ineffective against Omicron variants [21].
Similar decisions in the US have been made previously for bamlanivimab
monotherapy, which was revoked in April 2021 because of low efficacy against
newer COVID-19 variants [22].
In the context of increasing
prevalence of resistant SARS-CoV-2 subvariants, the decision to administer
tixagevimab plus cilgavimab, or any other mAbs to a given patient should be
based on regional prevalence of resistant variants, individual patient risks,
available resources, and logistics. Further, patients who receive mAbs as a
prophylactic for COVID-19 should continue taking precautions, including proper
hand hygiene, physical distancing, and mask wearing to avoid exposure (Table
3).
Although mAbs demonstrated
effectiveness, concerns have been raised regarding the potential for creating
spike protein resistance-associated viral mutations, particularly in
immunocompromised patients. A study conducted from January to February 2022
investigated whether resistance-associated mutations developed after treatment
with sotrovimab in high-risk patients. Out of the high-risk patients, specimens
were collected at three time points from 14 of the 18 patients (78%). Genomic
analysis revealed that all 18 (100%) patients were infected with the Omicron
variant; 17 with BA.1 (94%) and one with BA.2 (6%). Ten patients (56%)
developed receptor-binding domain mutations at spike position E340 or P337
within 3-31 days after treatment. The researchers identified six mutations in
the spike protein S: E340K/A/V/D/G/Q and three in S: P337L/R/S. Mutations
increased over time, exceeding 50% between days 5 and 28. Patients with
mutations had significantly delayed time to viral clearance (mean, 32 [SD, 8.1]
days vs 19.6 [SD, 11.1] days for those without mutations; HR, 0.11 [95% CI,
0.02-0.60]). No S: E340 or S: P337 mutations were found in the Omicron variant
from sequences in the general population. The four patients with the sotrovimab
resistance-associated S: E340K mutation were immunocompromised [23].
Evidence of how Fc-dependent
antibody functions may impact infection consequences within immunocompromised
populations is still limited, requiring a more robust framework for evaluation.
Sotrovimab is one of the few mAbs that demonstrated retained favourable
clinical outcomes against the Omicron variant and as such it is crucial to
understand Fc-mediated effects in order to evaluate and improve application of
antibody therapy.
The Omicron variant presents
a heightened risk to patients that are immunocompromised due to their inability
to mount a sufficient antibody response, even when they are vaccinated and/or
have previous COVID-19 infections. This reality places immunocompromised
patients at risk of death and hospitalization due to increased likelihood of
high viral load and their difficulty in eliminating the virus. There is a
continued need for research supporting multiple COVID-19 prophylaxis. The
medical and scientific community can best serve their immunocompromised
patients by updating their understanding of COVID-19 prophylaxis and its utility
in supporting immunocompromised patients. Moreover, there is an urgent need for
new randomized controlled trials in vaccinated, immunocompromised subjects,
during current strains of COVID-19 to support the development of more effective
mAbs (Table 4).
Reported
protection and antibody concentration from RCTs of monoclonal antibodies in
preventing COVID-19
Searched MEDLINE,
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register for randomized
placebo-controlled trials of SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)
used as pre-exposure and peri-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19. They was
included only studies where both protection from symptomatic infection and
pharmacokinetic information of the monoclonal antibody were provided within the
same study. They was identified six eligible studies assessing monoclonal
antibodies as pre-exposure and peri-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-. The
antibodies used in these studies were casirivimab/imdevimab (three studies),
bamlanivimab, cilgavimab/tixagevimab, and adintrevimab. Omicron variants were the dominant
circulating variants. One study assessed protection in two time periods;
firstly in a pre-Omicron period when the Delta variant was the dominant
circulating variant, and separately later when Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.1.1
were the dominant variants13. The overall efficacies against pre-Omicron
variants in the included studies ranged from 68.6% to 92.4%. Stadler et al. was
identified a trend for lower efficacies with increasing time since
administration and against the escaped variant, the latter being reported
previously by Schmidt et al. [24-28] (Figure 2).
The efficacy at each
time interval is shown in blue (points indicate observed efficacy, horizontal
error bars indicate time interval and vertical error bars represent 95% CIs of
efficacy). The antibody concentration is shown in black. An Antibody concentration
(n?=?1776 individuals) and efficacy data (n?=?5172 individuals) for
cilgavimab/tixagevimab was extracted from Levin et al.13 b Single
administration of casirivimab/imdevimab data are a combination of data from
O’Brien et al.14 and Herman et al.15 who report on the same clinical trial over
different follow-up intervals [14,15]. Efficacy data were reported weekly over
the first four weeks in O’Brien et al. (diamonds) (n?=?1505), and monthly for
eight months in Herman et al. (circles) (n?=?1683). Antibody concentration data
was reported up to day 168 in O’Brien et al. (solid line, b n?=?12), and
modeling of the pharmacokinetic profile of the antibody concentration, reported
in Herman et al., was used to inform the antibody concentration between 168 and
240 days (dashed line, b). Isa et al. [16] reported efficacy (n?=?969) and in
vivo concentration after repeated administration of 1.2?g of
casirivimab/imdevimab every 4 weeks (n?=?723). Hence, the antibody
concentration did not decline as in the other studies. The modelled
concentration of adintrevimab after a single administration was extracted from
the study by Schmidt et al. [12]. The efficacy of adintrevimab was reported
both when the delta variant was dominant (circles) (n?=?1267) and when Omicron
variants BA.1 and BA.1.1 were dominant (triangles) (n?=?378).
Development of universal COVID-19 antibodies
A new human monoclonal
antibody moves a step closer to a universal antibody cocktail that works
against all strains of SARS-CoV-2. A consortium of scientists at Texas
Biomedical Research Institute (Texas Biomed), the University of Alabama at
Birmingham (UAB) and Columbia University have developed a promising new human
monoclonal antibody that appears a step closer to a universal antibody cocktail
that works against all strains of SARS-CoV-2.
This antibody worked
against the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, Omicron and SARS-CoV, providing strong
evidence that this antibody will continue to work against future strains,
especially if paired with other antibodies. The newly designed antibody, called
1301B7, is a receptor binding domain antibody, meaning it targets a region of
the spike protein responsible for enabling the virus to bind and enter a cell.
By targeting this region, these antibodies are essentially stopping the virus
before they can infect a cell.
The antibody binds to
multiple positions within the receptor binding domain, which is thought to
enable it to tolerate variations that occur in this domain as the virus
continues to evolve. The precise nature of how the antibody binds to the
receptor binding domain was solved. The monoclonal antibody is designed based
on antibodies the UAB team isolated from patients infected with the Omicron
variant of SARS-CoV-2. The teams at Texas Biomed and Columbia University tested
the antibody against several variants including the original SARS-CoV-2
isolated in China, Omicron JN.1 and SARS-CoV.
In 2022, the
researchers described a monoclonal antibody targeting a different part of the
spike called the stalk. The researchers plan to next study what happens when
they combine the two antibodies together, attacking the virus from different
angles and hopefully preventing it from escaping neutralization. A single
antibody therapy is not going to work, so
may have to try something similar to therapies being developed for other
diseases like Ebola and HIV whereby two or three antibodies are combined to
target different regions of the virus.
They are also
interested in adapting the antibodies into a preventative vaccine. The Researchers
are also trying to design vaccines that would be able to induce these types of
antibodies so we don't have to update vaccines regularly. The consortium of
scientists has filed a provisional invention patent for 1301B7 and is in the
process of licensing it for commercialization.
Conclusion
COVID-19 still
represents a significant and disproportionate risk for immunocompromised
patients with comorbility, with infection often leading to serious and
protracted illness. Infection-fighting antibodies directly to patients who
often don’t respond adequately to vaccines, the data support that sipavibart
has the potential to provide much-needed protection against COVID-19 in this
highly vulnerable population. Immunocompromised patients currently have limited
or no options for COVID-19 protection and continue to face a significant burden
of disease, despite often being fully vaccinated. Sipavibart has the potential
to prevent COVID-19 in the immunocompromised and we will now work with
regulatory authorities globally to bring sipavibart to these vulnerable
patients.
Studying the
adaptation trajectory of SARS-CoV-2, it is crucial to anticipate possible
future events rooted in the molecular mechanisms that underpin the evolutionary
success of SARS-CoV-2 is essential. The potential role of advanced Treatment as
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 has introduced it as a new platform
to encourage the adaptation of emerging medical technologies for infectious
diseases. The use of monoclonal antibodies for Pre-Exposure in these cohorts
has the potential to provide long-term protection from both symptomatic and
severe COVID-19 for these vulnerable groups.
In December 2024, the
latest monoclonal antibody treatments for immunocompromised patients with
comorbidities still include Evusheld for prevention, but the emergence of
immune-evading Omicron subvariants has reduced the effectiveness of many
monoclonal antibodies like Bebtelovimab. The focus is on combination therapies,
long-acting monoclonal antibodies, and newer specific antibodies that can
better target a wider range of variants. Additionally, antiviral treatments are
often combined with monoclonal antibodies for a more comprehensive approach to
reducing disease severity and preventing complications. Several studies have
investigated the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies as pre- and post-prophylaxis
for COVID-19. Historical evidence is promising; however, new variants of
concern are proving challenging for currently available regimens.
10. World Health Organization (2022). Therapeutics
and COVID-19: living guideline. 2022.
13. Dube S. Continued Increased Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death in
Immunocompromised Individuals despite Receipt of ?4 Vaccine Doses: Updated 2023
Results from INFORM, a Retrospective Health Database Study in England. Poster
P0409 at ECCMID 2024.
14. Turtle L. Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Are at High Risk for
COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death Despite High Rates of Vaccination: Results
from the England INFORM Study. Oral Presentation at ECCMID 2024.
15. Turtle L. Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Are at High Risk for
COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death Despite High Rates of Vaccination: Results
from the England INFORM Study. Oral Presentation at ECCMID 2024.
16. Meeraus W. Immunocompromise, Cancer and Other Comorbidities in Patients
with Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Testing Positive versus Negative for
SARS-CoV-2: A Post Hoc Analysis of COVIDRIVE Data from May 2021 to May 2023.
Abstract #01800 at ECCMID 2024.
19. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-covid-therapy-evusheld-1.6731381
28. Texas Biomedical Research Institute. Researchers take step toward
development of universal COVID-19 antibodies. ScienceDaily. 2024.