The Next Frontiers and Innovative Therapeutics Strategies for Treatment - Prophylaxis in the Most Vulnerable Patients with the New Variants of Sars-Cov-2 and Comorbility: A Literature Review at January 2025 Download PDF

Journal Name : SunText Review of Virology

DOI : 10.51737/2766-5003.2024.060

Article Type : Research Article

Authors : Weimer LE, Cattari G, Fanales Belasio E, Cuccuru E and Vidili Gianpaolo

Keywords : SARS-CoV-2; Covid-19

Abstract

Over four years have passed since the beginning of the most significant health challenge in the 21st century has been the Sars-Cov-2. The extensive research and the Global Cooperation response has been rapid and effective with the profound understanding of fundamental biological and molecular characteristic of Covid-19 and many therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and small molecules developed for clinical use. The effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has been questioned because the virus and its variants have changed over time. This technical note highlights the need to assess the antiviral activity of these antibodies against new variants and adapt treatment strategies accordingly. Pre-exposure prophylaxis using the latest monoclonal antibodies is one complementary preventative therapy to reduce severity of breakthrough Sars-Cov-2 in vulnerable persons with severe immunocompromise due organ transplant, cancer, HIV or use of certain medications experience diminished Covid-19 vaccine immune response and remain at higher risk for severe Sars-Cov-2 outcomes ; across many studies, Monoclonal Antibodies Pre-Exposure is associated with a 60% to 80% reduction in severe COVID-19 outcomes. Covid-19 variants evolution, however, leads to viral mutations that can evade Monoclonal Antibodies due to the selective nature of their binding sites. Several Monoclonal Antibodies that received FDA emergency use authorization for prevention of Sars-Cov-2 have since had this authorization revoked once circulating variants demonstrated immune evasion.


Background

Over five years have passed since the beginning of the most significant health challenge in the 21st century has been the Sars-Cov-2. As of January 2025, monoclonal antibodies for treating immunocompromised patients with the Neus Variants of Sars-Cov-2 (especially those with comorbidities) have evolved significantly since the early pandemic stages. However, newer treatments may still be under investigation or regulatory review. The extensive research and the Global Cooperation response has been rapid and effective with  the profound understanding of fundamental biological and molecular characteristic of Covid-19 and many therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and small molecules developed for clinical use [1].

The effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has been questioned because the virus and its variants have changed over time. This technical note highlights the need to assess the antiviral activity of these antibodies against new variants and adapt treatment strategies accordingly.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis using the latest monoclonal antibodies is one complementary preventative therapy to reduce severity of breakthrough Sars-Cov-2 in vulnerable persons with severe immunocompromise due organ transplant, cancer, HIV or use of certain medications experience diminished Covid-19 vaccine immune response and remain at higher risk for severe Sars-Cov-2 outcomes [2]; across many studies, Monoclonal Antibodies Pre-Exposure is associated with a 60% to 80% reduction in severe COVID-19 outcomes.

Covid-19 variants evolution, however, leads to viral mutations that can evade Monoclonal Antibodies due to the selective nature of their binding sites. Several Monoclonal Antibodies that received FDA emergency use authorization for prevention of Sars-Cov-2 have since had this authorization revoked once circulating variants demonstrated immune evasion [3].

Introduction

Sars-Cov-2 still represents a disproportionate risk for vulnerable patients, with infection often leading to serious and protracted illness. Vaccination against Sars-Cov-2 has reduced in the Word the burden Covid-19. The urgent need to find new therapeutic strategies to combat the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic led to the design of numerous anti-Covid 19 monoclonal antibody for Therapy and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for the Latest Variants [4]. The immunocompromised persons and those who cannot be vaccinated, remain at risk for severe Covid-19.

As the world deals with this evolving threat, the narrative extends to the realm of emerging variants, each displaying new mutations with implications that remain largely misunderstood. Notably, the JN.1 Omicron lineage is gaining global prevalence, and early findings suggest it stands among the immune-evading variants, a characteristic attributed to its mutation L455S. Moreover, the detrimental consequences of the novel emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages bear a particularly critical impact on immunocompromised individuals and older adults. Immunocompromised individuals face challenges such as suboptimal responses to COVID-19 vaccines, rendering them more susceptible to severe disease. Similarly, older adults have an increased risk of severe disease and the presence of comorbid conditions, find themselves at a heightened vulnerability to develop COVID-19 disease. Thus, recognizing these intricate factors is crucial for effectively tailoring public health strategies to protect these vulnerable populations. In this context, this review aims to describe, analyze, and discuss the current progress of the next-generation treatments encompassing   the latest monoclonal antibodies for Pre-Exposure Therapy immunotherapeutic approaches and advanced therapies emerging as complements that will offer solutions to counter the disadvantages of the existing options.

Although Monoclonal Antibodies as Prophilaxis and Therapy report efficacy as between 50-85% [5-6], global access is currently largely inequitable. Preliminary outcomes show that these strategies target the virus and address the immunomodulatory responses associated with COVID-19. Furthermore, the capacity to promote tissue repair has been demonstrated, which can be particularly noteworthy for immunocompromised individuals who stand as vulnerable actors in the global landscape of coronavirus infections [7-9].

Monoclonal antibodies, which protect against disease irrespective of immune system status and provide rapid protection, are potential options for Covid-19 immunoprophylaxis. Some combinations of monoclonal antibodies are already in use through emergency or temporary authorization for pre-exposure or post-exposure prophylaxis against Covid-19 or treatment of mild-to-moderate disease.

The emerging next-generation treatments possess broader potential, offering protection against a wide range of variants and enhancing the ability to counter the impact of the constant evolution of the virus. On the one hand, in vitro studies have suggested reduced susceptibility of the latest variants to monoclonal antibodies, whereas clinical data still show benefits in reducing severe illness and mortality, indicating that laboratory results do not always mirror real-world outcomes. As a result, although resistance to monoclonal antibodies can develop over time, they could still have an important role in COVID-19 treatment, especially when used in combination, and ongoing research aims to identify effective antibodies against new variants. The main purpose of this literature Review is to highlight the possible strategies to optimize and protect current and future therapeutic options Pre-Exposure to treat the most vulnerable patients [10-11].

New Variants: "Almost a New Pandemic"

Because of the fast-evolving nature of COVID-19 treatments and the emergence of new variants, the landscape for monoclonal antibody therapies may have shifted. It is critical for healthcare providers to stay updated on the most current guidance from agencies like the FDA and the WHO, and to choose therapies based on the latest variant prevalence, individual health conditions, and treatment availability.

With the emergence of this new variants, the researchers realized that vaccination offered less protection and that a third dose was needed to immunize the population. While previous variants had fewer than ten mutations on the spike protein compared with the original strain, Omicron had more than thirty. It was almost as if a new pandemic had begun. What the researchers were less aware of was that Omicron had a significant ability to evade monoclonal antibodies. This was demonstrated by several scientists in an article published in December 2021. In their research, the scientists showed that two thirds of the monoclonal antibodies used in clinical practice or currently under development lost all their antiviral activity against Omicron. The situation also became increasingly complex as several sub variants (BA.1, BA.2, etc.) emerged over the following weeks. So the scientists tried to determine whether the monoclonal antibodies were effective against the new strains that were co-circulating. In a study published in March 2022, they provided a number of answers. The casirivimab/imdevimab combination, which until then had offered a similar level of protection against severe forms of COVID-19 as vaccination, was no longer active against Omicron. The neutralizing activity of another antibody cocktail (tixagevimab/cilgavimab) was significantly reduced against BA.1 compared with the Delta variant, but its neutralizing activity was not reduced nearly as much against BA.2. This result, which showed that a monoclonal antibody could lose its neutralizing capability for a given variant before recovering it for a subsequent variant, emphasizes the importance of continuing with efficacy testing on all available antibodies (Figure 1).

The protective efficacy of monoclonal antibodies depends primarily, but not solely, on their neutralizing capability. Some monoclonal antibodies can also induce a key immune defense mechanism known as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), which kills cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the case of COVID-19, natural killer (NK) cells in the immune system recognize the antibodies that bind to antigens on the surface of infected cells and then specifically lyse those cells. These antibodies are described as "polyfunctional." This characteristic is all the more interesting since the monoclonal antibodies with the highest neutralizing capability are not those that induce ADCC the most, as shown in a study published in December 2022. In short, to obtain protective antibody cocktails, it may be a good idea to include polyfunctional antibodies which combine a high neutralizing capability with a strong ability to induce immune defense mechanisms [12].

Key Variants of Concern in December 2024

Omicron Sublineages (XBB family)

XBB.1 and XBB.1.5: These sublineages of XBB have been circulating widely. XBB variants, including XBB.1 and its sublineages, continue to show high levels of immune escape, meaning they can evade immunity from previous infections or vaccinations to some extent. These variants have been associated with reinfections in individuals who had previously been exposed to COVID-19 or vaccinated.

XBB.2.75: This sublineage of XBB is also a major variant of concern, with continued reports of immune evasion and increased transmissibility compared to previous strains. The high number of mutations in the spike protein and other regions make this subvariant a key focus for both surveillance and vaccine updates [12,13].

BQ and BF Subvariants

BQ.1 and BQ.1.1: These are subvariants of Omicron that have demonstrated increased transmissibility and partial resistance to immunity from both previous infection and vaccines. They have been circulating in various regions and remain a concern due to their ability to evade neutralizing antibodies.

BF.7: Another important Omicron subvariant, which has been noted for its ability to potentially escape immunity, though vaccines still help protect against severe disease.

Monitoring of Emerging Variants

While Omicron remains the dominant lineage, there are always potential for new subvariants or entirely new variants to emerge, especially if mutations lead to more concerning traits, such as:

·       Increased transmissibility.

·       Higher resistance to immunity from vaccines or past infections.

·       Potential to cause more severe disease.

Health authorities like the WHO, CDC, and other global and regional bodies continuously monitor for any significant changes in the virus’s behavior. If new strains show signs of increased transmissibility or a higher risk of severe outcomes, they may be classified as Variants of Concern.

As of January 2025, monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 treatment, particularly for immunocompromised patients and those with comorbidities, are still a key part of managing COVID-19 in high-risk groups. The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, especially Omicron subvariants, has impacted the effectiveness of some earlier treatments, and newer monoclonal antibody combinations are being investigated or deployed to counteract immune evasion and improve outcomes for vulnerable patients.

Latest Monoclonal Antibodies and Combinations (December 2024)

Evusheld (AstraZeneca):

·       Components: Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab.

·       Indication: Evusheld is still widely used for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in immunocompromised individuals who are unable to mount an adequate immune response to vaccines. This includes people with conditions like cancer, autoimmune diseases, or those on immunosuppressive therapies.

·       Effectiveness: Though Evusheld has shown some diminished effectiveness against certain Omicron subvariants (e.g., XBB and BQ/BF subvariants), it is still considered a cornerstone in protecting vulnerable populations. Efforts to modify or enhance its effectiveness are ongoing.

Bebtelovimab (Lilly):

·       Indication: Bebtelovimab was used for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in high-risk patients, including those who are immunocompromised, to prevent severe outcomes. However, due to the emergence of newer Omicron subvariants with mutations in the spike protein, Bebtelovimab has seen reduced effectiveness.

·       Status: It is becoming less favored due to its reduced efficacy against Omicron subvariants, but it may still be used in some contexts where other options are unavailable.

Combination of Monoclonal Antibodies (Emerging Treatments):

·       New combinations of monoclonal antibodies are being developed to provide broader protection against immune-evading variants. These combinations are designed to target multiple epitopes of the spike protein, reducing the chance of the virus escaping the therapy due to mutations. Examples include:

·       Dual or Triple Antibody Combinations: Research is ongoing to combine multiple monoclonal antibodies that can bind to different parts of the spike protein or other regions of the virus. These could provide better protection against the current circulating Omicron subvariants.

·       Bamlanivimab and Etesevimab (Eli Lilly): These were used as a combination treatment in the earlier stages of the pandemic but have shown limited effectiveness against recent Omicron variants, making them less commonly used today.

Long-Acting Antibodies for Prevention and Treatment:

·       Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibodies (LAMAs): These therapies are being investigated to offer longer-lasting protection against SARS-CoV-2, which is particularly beneficial for those who cannot mount an effective immune response. The concept behind these therapies is to provide extended immunity, which may be crucial for immunocompromised individuals who cannot rely on vaccines alone.

Key Considerations for Immunocompromised Patients

Variant-Specific Efficacy: The effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies has varied based on the circulating variant of SARS-CoV-2. Omicron subvariants like XBB and BQ have shown the potential to evade some antibodies designed for earlier strains. As a result, new monoclonal antibodies or combinations are being developed to enhance neutralizing activity against these newer variants.

Therapeutic vs. Prophylactic Use: Some monoclonal antibodies, such as Evusheld, are used prophylactically (to prevent infection), while others, like Bebtelovimab, have been used to treat COVID-19 in the early stages of infection. The choice of therapy will depend on the patient’s condition, the timing of infection, and the specific circulating variants [13].

Combination Therapies

In some cases, monoclonal antibodies are combined with antiviral medications (like Paxlovid) or other supportive therapies to improve outcomes in immunocompromised patients. These combinations may include:

·       Monoclonal antibodies + Antiviral treatments (e.g., Paxlovid): This combination can reduce viral load and prevent progression to severe disease, especially in high-risk individuals.

·       Monoclonal antibodies + Corticosteroids: For more severe cases, the combination of monoclonal antibodies with corticosteroids (which reduce inflammation) is sometimes used to manage severe COVID-19 infections.

Ongoing Research and Regulatory Approval

With the continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2, pharmaceutical companies and researchers are focusing on:

·       Broader spectrum monoclonal antibodies: These would bind to various parts of the virus’s spike protein or other regions, reducing the likelihood of immune escape.

·       Updated monoclonal antibodies tailored to emerging Omicron subvariants like XBB and BQ/BF, as these strains continue to circulate globally.

Patients Immunocompromised with comorbidity and Sars-Cov-2 (Emerging Treatments)

Individuals with immunosuppressed conditions, including people with primary immunodeficiency’s and secondary immunodeficiencies, consisting of people with solid-organ trans-plants, metastatic cancers, hematologic malignancies, advanced or untreated HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection, those receiving cancer chemotherapy, and patients with autoimmune diseases receiving immunosuppressive biologics and medications.

Patients in this heterogeneous group had a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization, severe COVID-19, or death and tend to have higher risk for opportunistic infections.  In addition, prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistent viral replication in ICP not only cause long duration of symptoms but also risk of emergence of antiviral-resistant or vaccine-escaped variants, prolonging the pandemic [14-20].

Although COVID-19 treatment guidelines had been proposed to manage patients with different severities and clinical cohorts, a consensus on COVID-19 patients in ICP was lacking and the information was limited. Immunocompromised individuals are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Vaccination remains a critical preventive mea-sure for this vulnerable population. Although some may have a reduced response to vaccines, receiving the recommended doses can still provide some level of protection and potentially mitigate severe disease.

Given the potential for diminished vaccine response, immunocompromised individuals should be considered for booster doses based on local guidelines and emerging data.   In cases of exposure to COVID-19, immunocompromised individuals may require specific isolation or quarantine measures, depending on their risk profile. The management of COVID-19 in ICP necessitates an individualized approach. Clinicians must carefully consider the patient's specific immunocompromised condition, medical history, and risk factors to determine the most appropriate treatment plan. In severe COVID-19 cases among ICP, antiviral therapies such as remdesivir may be considered.

The decision to use antiviral drugs should be based on clinical judgment and consultation with specialists from multidisciplinary areas. In severe COVID-19 cases with significant inflammatory responses, corticosteroids like dexamethasone may be used under close medical supervision. The use of CCP therapy in specific severe cases of COVID-19 among immunocompromised patients may be considered on a case-by-case basis early in the pandemic. Therapeutic recommendations for antiviral or immunomodulation therapy of adults with varying severities of COVID-19 are summarized in (Table 1).

Effectiveness of Monoclonal Antibody-based therapy Against Covid Variants (January 2025)

Monoclonal antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 S protein act through mechanisms related to their structure. First, the antigen-binding fragments (Fab) prevent the virus from binding to the ACE2 receptors, and second, the Fc fragment can activate the complement system and bind to the Immunoglobulin Fc receptors (FcRs) on cytotoxic cells that can eliminate virus-infected cells through Ab-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Unfortunately, some mAbs can bind to macrophage FcRs and induce a hyperinflammatory response resulting from Ab-dependent enhancement (ADE) of cytokine production.

The SARS-CoV-2 RBD has become the main target of mAbs because of its crucial role in virus entry into host cells (Table 2). Analysis of the structural relationship between RBD and anti-RBD NAbs has led to the classification of these antibodies according to structural features and mechanism of action. Class 1 NAbs, e.g., CT-P59 (regdanvimab), target the receptor binding motif (RBM). They recognize the RBD in the up conformation, thus blocking the interaction with the ACE2 receptor. Class 2 NAbs, e.g. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab), target the ACE2 binding site of the RBD in both up and down conformations. Class 3 antibodies, e.g., S309 (sotrovimab), target the conserved core domain of the RBD without altering interactions with the ACE2 receptor. Class 4 antibodies, e.g., S2X259, target epitopes in both the RBM and the core domain of the RBD. Unfortunately, frequent mutations in the RBD have modified the epitopes recognized by mAbs, resulting in the emergence of viral variants resistant to mAbs. To address this issue, researchers are exploring other SRS-CoV-2 regions as potential targets for therapeutic mAbs.

Monoclonal Antibodies Aprovation as Prophylaxis-Therapy in the Elderly and Immonocompromised Sars-Cov-2 population at January 2025

Currently, most mAbs are ineffective at providing an immune response to Omicron strains post BA.2. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration and provinces in Canada have found tixagevimab plus cilgavimab ineffective against Omicron variants [21]. Similar decisions in the US have been made previously for bamlanivimab monotherapy, which was revoked in April 2021 because of low efficacy against newer COVID-19 variants [22].

In the context of increasing prevalence of resistant SARS-CoV-2 subvariants, the decision to administer tixagevimab plus cilgavimab, or any other mAbs to a given patient should be based on regional prevalence of resistant variants, individual patient risks, available resources, and logistics. Further, patients who receive mAbs as a prophylactic for COVID-19 should continue taking precautions, including proper hand hygiene, physical distancing, and mask wearing to avoid exposure (Table 3).

Although mAbs demonstrated effectiveness, concerns have been raised regarding the potential for creating spike protein resistance-associated viral mutations, particularly in immunocompromised patients. A study conducted from January to February 2022 investigated whether resistance-associated mutations developed after treatment with sotrovimab in high-risk patients. Out of the high-risk patients, specimens were collected at three time points from 14 of the 18 patients (78%). Genomic analysis revealed that all 18 (100%) patients were infected with the Omicron variant; 17 with BA.1 (94%) and one with BA.2 (6%). Ten patients (56%) developed receptor-binding domain mutations at spike position E340 or P337 within 3-31 days after treatment. The researchers identified six mutations in the spike protein S: E340K/A/V/D/G/Q and three in S: P337L/R/S. Mutations increased over time, exceeding 50% between days 5 and 28. Patients with mutations had significantly delayed time to viral clearance (mean, 32 [SD, 8.1] days vs 19.6 [SD, 11.1] days for those without mutations; HR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02-0.60]). No S: E340 or S: P337 mutations were found in the Omicron variant from sequences in the general population. The four patients with the sotrovimab resistance-associated S: E340K mutation were immunocompromised [23].

Evidence of how Fc-dependent antibody functions may impact infection consequences within immunocompromised populations is still limited, requiring a more robust framework for evaluation. Sotrovimab is one of the few mAbs that demonstrated retained favourable clinical outcomes against the Omicron variant and as such it is crucial to understand Fc-mediated effects in order to evaluate and improve application of antibody therapy.

The Omicron variant presents a heightened risk to patients that are immunocompromised due to their inability to mount a sufficient antibody response, even when they are vaccinated and/or have previous COVID-19 infections. This reality places immunocompromised patients at risk of death and hospitalization due to increased likelihood of high viral load and their difficulty in eliminating the virus. There is a continued need for research supporting multiple COVID-19 prophylaxis. The medical and scientific community can best serve their immunocompromised patients by updating their understanding of COVID-19 prophylaxis and its utility in supporting immunocompromised patients. Moreover, there is an urgent need for new randomized controlled trials in vaccinated, immunocompromised subjects, during current strains of COVID-19 to support the development of more effective mAbs (Table 4).

Reported protection and antibody concentration from RCTs of monoclonal antibodies in preventing COVID-19

Searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register for randomized placebo-controlled trials of SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used as pre-exposure and peri-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19. They was included only studies where both protection from symptomatic infection and pharmacokinetic information of the monoclonal antibody were provided within the same study. They was identified six eligible studies assessing monoclonal antibodies as pre-exposure and peri-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-. The antibodies used in these studies were casirivimab/imdevimab (three studies), bamlanivimab, cilgavimab/tixagevimab, and adintrevimab.  Omicron variants were the dominant circulating variants. One study assessed protection in two time periods; firstly in a pre-Omicron period when the Delta variant was the dominant circulating variant, and separately later when Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.1.1 were the dominant variants13. The overall efficacies against pre-Omicron variants in the included studies ranged from 68.6% to 92.4%. Stadler et al. was identified a trend for lower efficacies with increasing time since administration and against the escaped variant, the latter being reported previously by Schmidt et al. [24-28] (Figure 2).

The efficacy at each time interval is shown in blue (points indicate observed efficacy, horizontal error bars indicate time interval and vertical error bars represent 95% CIs of efficacy). The antibody concentration is shown in black. An Antibody concentration (n?=?1776 individuals) and efficacy data (n?=?5172 individuals) for cilgavimab/tixagevimab was extracted from Levin et al.13 b Single administration of casirivimab/imdevimab data are a combination of data from O’Brien et al.14 and Herman et al.15 who report on the same clinical trial over different follow-up intervals [14,15]. Efficacy data were reported weekly over the first four weeks in O’Brien et al. (diamonds) (n?=?1505), and monthly for eight months in Herman et al. (circles) (n?=?1683). Antibody concentration data was reported up to day 168 in O’Brien et al. (solid line, b n?=?12), and modeling of the pharmacokinetic profile of the antibody concentration, reported in Herman et al., was used to inform the antibody concentration between 168 and 240 days (dashed line, b). Isa et al. [16] reported efficacy (n?=?969) and in vivo concentration after repeated administration of 1.2?g of casirivimab/imdevimab every 4 weeks (n?=?723). Hence, the antibody concentration did not decline as in the other studies. The modelled concentration of adintrevimab after a single administration was extracted from the study by Schmidt et al. [12]. The efficacy of adintrevimab was reported both when the delta variant was dominant (circles) (n?=?1267) and when Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.1.1 were dominant (triangles) (n?=?378).

Development of universal COVID-19 antibodies

A new human monoclonal antibody moves a step closer to a universal antibody cocktail that works against all strains of SARS-CoV-2. A consortium of scientists at Texas Biomedical Research Institute (Texas Biomed), the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and Columbia University have developed a promising new human monoclonal antibody that appears a step closer to a universal antibody cocktail that works against all strains of SARS-CoV-2.

This antibody worked against the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, Omicron and SARS-CoV, providing strong evidence that this antibody will continue to work against future strains, especially if paired with other antibodies. The newly designed antibody, called 1301B7, is a receptor binding domain antibody, meaning it targets a region of the spike protein responsible for enabling the virus to bind and enter a cell. By targeting this region, these antibodies are essentially stopping the virus before they can infect a cell.

The antibody binds to multiple positions within the receptor binding domain, which is thought to enable it to tolerate variations that occur in this domain as the virus continues to evolve. The precise nature of how the antibody binds to the receptor binding domain was solved. The monoclonal antibody is designed based on antibodies the UAB team isolated from patients infected with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. The teams at Texas Biomed and Columbia University tested the antibody against several variants including the original SARS-CoV-2 isolated in China, Omicron JN.1 and SARS-CoV.

In 2022, the researchers described a monoclonal antibody targeting a different part of the spike called the stalk. The researchers plan to next study what happens when they combine the two antibodies together, attacking the virus from different angles and hopefully preventing it from escaping neutralization. A single antibody therapy is not going to work, so  may have to try something similar to therapies being developed for other diseases like Ebola and HIV whereby two or three antibodies are combined to target different regions of the virus.

They are also interested in adapting the antibodies into a preventative vaccine. The Researchers are also trying to design vaccines that would be able to induce these types of antibodies so we don't have to update vaccines regularly. The consortium of scientists has filed a provisional invention patent for 1301B7 and is in the process of licensing it for commercialization.

Conclusion

COVID-19 still represents a significant and disproportionate risk for immunocompromised patients with comorbility, with infection often leading to serious and protracted illness. Infection-fighting antibodies directly to patients who often don’t respond adequately to vaccines, the data support that sipavibart has the potential to provide much-needed protection against COVID-19 in this highly vulnerable population. Immunocompromised patients currently have limited or no options for COVID-19 protection and continue to face a significant burden of disease, despite often being fully vaccinated. Sipavibart has the potential to prevent COVID-19 in the immunocompromised and we will now work with regulatory authorities globally to bring sipavibart to these vulnerable patients.

Studying the adaptation trajectory of SARS-CoV-2, it is crucial to anticipate possible future events rooted in the molecular mechanisms that underpin the evolutionary success of SARS-CoV-2 is essential. The potential role of advanced Treatment as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 has introduced it as a new platform to encourage the adaptation of emerging medical technologies for infectious diseases. The use of monoclonal antibodies for Pre-Exposure in these cohorts has the potential to provide long-term protection from both symptomatic and severe COVID-19 for these vulnerable groups.

In December 2024, the latest monoclonal antibody treatments for immunocompromised patients with comorbidities still include Evusheld for prevention, but the emergence of immune-evading Omicron subvariants has reduced the effectiveness of many monoclonal antibodies like Bebtelovimab. The focus is on combination therapies, long-acting monoclonal antibodies, and newer specific antibodies that can better target a wider range of variants. Additionally, antiviral treatments are often combined with monoclonal antibodies for a more comprehensive approach to reducing disease severity and preventing complications. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies as pre- and post-prophylaxis for COVID-19. Historical evidence is promising; however, new variants of concern are proving challenging for currently available regimens.


References

1.      Vardavas CI, Mathioudakis AG, Nikitara K, Stamatelopoulos K, Georgiopoulos G, Phalkey R, et al. Prognostic factors for mortality, intensive care unit and hospital admission due to SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in Europe. Eur Respir Rev. 2022; 31: 166.

2.      Ryan L. Vaccinated but Not Protected - Living Immunocompromised During the Pandemic. JAMA. 2021; 325: 2443-2444.

3.      Herman GA, O'Brien MP, Forleo-Neto E, Sarkar N, Isa F, Hou P, et al. COVID-19 Phase 3 Prevention Trial Team. Efficacy and safety of a single dose of casirivimab and imdevimab for the prevention of COVID-19 over an 8-month period: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 22: 1444-1454.

4.      Levin MJ, Ustianowski A, De Wit S, Launay O, Avila M, Templeton A, et al. Intramuscular AZD7442 (tixagevimab–cilgavimab) for prevention of Covid-19. New England J Medicine. 2022; 386: 2188-2200.

5.      Cao Y, Yisimayi A, Jian F, Song W, Xiao T, Wang L, et al. BA. 2.12. 1, BA. 4 and BA. 5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature. 2022; 608: 593-602.

6.      Yamasoba D, Kosugi Y, Kimura I, Fujita S, Uriu K, Ito J, et al. Neutralisation sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22: 942-93.

7.      United States Food Drug Administration (2022). FDA updates Sotrovimab emergency use authorization. FDA. 2022.

8.      Abdelnabi R, Foo CS, Kaptein SJ, Zhang X, Do TN, Langendries L, et al. The combined treatment of Molnupiravir and Favipiravir results in a potentiation of antiviral efficacy in a SARS-CoV-2 hamster infection model. EBioMedicine. 2021; 72.

9.      Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, et al. REGEN-COV antibody combination and outcomes in outpatients with Covid-19. New Engl J Med. 2021; 38: e8.

10.    World Health Organization (2022). Therapeutics and COVID-19: living guideline. 2022.

11.    Van Erp EA, Luytjes W, Ferwerda G, Van Kasteren PB. Fc-mediated antibody effector functions during respiratory syncytial virus infection and disease. Frontiers Immunology. 2019; 10: 548.

12.    Evans RA, Dube S, Lu Y, Yates M, Arnetorp S, Barnes E, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Immunocompromised Populations during the Omicron Era: Insights from the Observational Population-Based INFORM Study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 2023; 1: 100747.

13.    Dube S. Continued Increased Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death in Immunocompromised Individuals despite Receipt of ?4 Vaccine Doses: Updated 2023 Results from INFORM, a Retrospective Health Database Study in England. Poster P0409 at ECCMID 2024.

14.    Turtle L. Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Are at High Risk for COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death Despite High Rates of Vaccination: Results from the England INFORM Study. Oral Presentation at ECCMID 2024.

15.    Turtle L. Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Are at High Risk for COVID-19 Hospitalisation and Death Despite High Rates of Vaccination: Results from the England INFORM Study. Oral Presentation at ECCMID 2024.

16.    Meeraus W. Immunocompromise, Cancer and Other Comorbidities in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Testing Positive versus Negative for SARS-CoV-2: A Post Hoc Analysis of COVIDRIVE Data from May 2021 to May 2023. Abstract #01800 at ECCMID 2024.

17.    Ketkar A, Willey V, Pollack M, Glasser L, Dobie C, Wenziger C, et al. Assessing the risk and costs of COVID-19 in immunocompromised populations in a large United States commercial insurance health plan: the EPOCH-US Study. Current Medical Research Opinion. 2023; 39: 1103-1118.

18.    Miljanovic D, Cirkovic A, Lazarevic I, Knezevic A, Cupic M, Banko A. Clinical efficacy of anti?SARS?CoV?2 monoclonal antibodies in preventing hospitalisation and mortality among patients infected with Omicron variants: A systematic review and meta?analysis. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2023; 33: e2439.

19.    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-covid-therapy-evusheld-1.6731381

20.    Francica JR, Cai Y, Diallo S, Rosenthal K, Ren K, Flores DJ, et al. 1355. The SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibody AZD3152 Potently Neutralizes Historical and Emerging Variants and is Being Developed for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 in High-risk Individuals. InOpen Forum Infectious Diseases 2023; 10.

21.    Cowan J, Amson A, Christofides A, Chagla Z. Monoclonal antibodies as COVID-19 prophylaxis therapy in immunocompromised patient populations. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2023.

22.    Stadler E, Burgess MT, Schlub TE, Khan SR, Chai KL, McQuilten ZK, et al. Monoclonal antibody levels and protection from COVID-19. Nature Communications. 2023; 14: 4545.

23.    Schmidt P, Narayan K, Li Y, Kaku CI, Brown ME, Champney E, et al. Antibody-mediated protection against symptomatic COVID-19 can be achieved at low serum neutralizing titers. Science Translational Medicine. 2023; 15: 2783.

24.    Levin MJ, Ustianowski A, De Wit S, Launay O, Avila M, Templeton A, et al. Intramuscular AZD7442 (tixagevimab–cilgavimab) for prevention of Covid-19. New England J Medicine. 2022; 386: 2188-200.

25.    O’Brien MP, Forleo-Neto E, Musser BJ, Isa F, Chan KC, Sarkar N, et al. Subcutaneous REGEN-COV antibody combination to prevent Covid-19. New England J Medicine. 2021; 385: 1184-1195.

26.    Herman GA, O'Brien MP, Forleo-Neto E, Sarkar N, Isa F, Hou P, et al. Efficacy and safety of a single dose of casirivimab and imdevimab for the prevention of COVID-19 over an 8-month period: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22: 1444-154.

27.    Piepenbrink MS, Khalil AM, Chang A, Mostafa A, Basu M, Sarkar S, et al. Potent neutralization by a receptor binding domain monoclonal antibody with broad specificity for SARS-CoV-2 JN. 1 and other variants. bioRxiv. 2024: 2024-04.

28.    Texas Biomedical Research Institute. Researchers take step toward development of universal COVID-19 antibodies. ScienceDaily. 2024.