Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Wondimagegn Girma Abebe and Dawit Negassa Golga
Keywords : Streetism; Instrumental case study; Causes; Current situations; Consequences
The objective of this
study was to examine the phenomenon of streetism by employing the instrumental
case study design and taking Hawassa City as a case. The researchers
deliberately selected a sample of 12 street children and 4 key informants to
gather the necessary data. To collect the data, the researchers employed
interview protocols and focus group discussions as their tools. Thematic
analyses were utilized to comprehend the phenomenon being studied. Three major
themes and nine sub-themes were generated inductively to portray the phenomenon
of streetism. The study revealed that street children primarily turn to street
life as a result of factors such as poverty, familial abandonment, violence,
the perception of freedom, and peer influence. In order to sustain their
livelihood, these children engage primarily in informal labour, experience a
transition within the street life, and spend a majority of their time
participating in non-formal work and substance consumption. Due to their
exposure to urban environments, individuals who participate in street life are
susceptible to various health ailments, acts of aggression, substance abuse,
and engagement in criminal activities. The phenomenon of streetism has evolved
into a multifaceted and intricate social problem in contemporary times,
necessitating a comprehensive and collaborative approach from society at large.
On
a global basis, the epidemic of streetism among children is expanding
significantly and quickly. The vast majority of these kids live and work in the
busy streets of big cities all around the world. Depending on how involved they
are in street life, UNICEF has divided street children into two categories:
"children on the street" and "children of the street."
"Children on the street" are people who live on the streets mostly to
make ends meet financially, but they are still connected to their families. On
the other hand, "children of the street" are individuals who do not
have a permanent residence and who, without the support of their families,
live, work, and sleep on the streets [1]. Although many countries are aware of
the existence of street children, it is difficult to provide a precise image of
them. Some children move from one place to another or visit their relatives on
occasion, depending on the time of year and their personal circumstances [2].
Since a sizable fraction of the population lacks birth certificates or identity
documents, official figures are unavailable. The number of street children in a
certain country may differ depending on the information's source (government,
non-governmental organizations, research institutions), as well as whether or
not the issue is a top priority for development in the specific country [3].
Approximately 100 million street children live in the world, with half of them
being in Latin America, according to UNICEF estimates [4]. However, there are
regional variations in terms of intensity [5]. The demands of these disgruntled
children jeopardize socioeconomic programs and social infrastructure, making it
more dangerous in developing countries [3]. For instance, 32 million children
in sub-Saharan Africa are estimated to be homeless, according to a UNICEF assessment
from 2006 (Figure 1).
Most
street youngsters are at least ten years old all around the world. The majority
of street children served by current programs are between the ages of 8 and 18
[1]. In most countries, it appears that there are more men than women living on
the streets. Street girls are certainly an understudied reality, despite the
fact that they might not be as well-known [1].
They
also have a higher probability of engaging in prostitution and experiencing
violence and sexual abuse at the hands of peers and adults [1]. Africa's
political and social growth is happening quickly and widely, which has benefits
and drawbacks. A considerable proportion of youngsters become homeless as a
result of the latter [2]. Ethiopia is one of these nations where the number of
street children afflicted with various ailments is rising [6]. It is not
uncommon for kids to become homeless. It now suddenly shows up in places where
it was never previously. Ethiopia currently has tens of thousands of homeless
children; therefore, the problem is worsening [6]. It is more difficult for
homeless children to support themselves because of the plethora of problems
they face on a daily basis. For example, youth who determine that homelessness
is their only option face the possibility of falling prey to a range of
criminal activities and violent scenarios, such as drug abuse, prostitution,
assault, family breakup, and desertion [2]. According to UNODC estimates from
2006, there are between 150,000 and 200,000 street children in Ethiopia, with
an additional 1,000,000 vulnerable or at-risk youngsters. Many have experienced
significant changes since then.
According
to a recent estimate from the Ethiopian Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs,
there were around 29,000 homeless people living in Addis Abeba in 2018. 13,500
street children and 15,500 adult homeless people were included in this number.
This sum was determined by the researchers based on estimations from focus
group discussions and interviews held with communities, sub-city authorities,
and non-governmental organization. In addition, the city is home for 4000
street children, according to [7]. Irrespective of the conditions and contexts
s/he is in every child has the right to develop to the fullest extent possible
in terms of social, emotional, cognitive, and physical domains, according to
the UNCRC (1989). This convention, which defines children's rights and services
as survival, protection, development, and participation in social activities,
was ratified by the Ethiopian government in 1991 [8]. Nonetheless, a review of
pertinent literature indicates that street children experience stigma and receive
the least amount of assistance from the community [5]. They failed to establish
good ties with important organizations in the areas of family, education,
health, and other fields in their early years [9]. In addition, the human
rights, social networks, and resources of street children are adversely
affected [10]. Their social marginalization is strongly suggested by these
combinations of deprivations. The goal of this research was to delve into and
develop deeper understanding of the causes, current situation, and consequences
of streetism in Hawassa City."
Statement of the problem
Street
children are a disenfranchised group in most civilizations. They don't engage
with the three main institutions of children that society considers
appropriate: the family, the school, and the health. The nature of their
lifestyles and continuous exposure to harsh environments puts their mental,
physical, social, and spiritual well-being in peril and increases their
susceptibility to substance abuse [11]. Homeless children are a worldwide
problem, but they are more common in South American, Asian, and African
countries [12]. However, its scope, nature, and underlying causes vary from
continent to continent, nation to nation, society to society, and even from one
child to the next, depending on institutional interventions, economic growth,
cultural and traditional context, and the degree of societal harmony and peace
[13]. In Ethiopia, a variety of economic, political, and cultural reasons
contribute to the situation where children end up living on the streets [14].
Children who are homeless are impacted by society and the outside world in both
direct and indirect ways. According to [15], these impacts are reciprocal and
bi-directional. We might be able to spot certain trends and differences in the
push and pull forces affecting homeless children thanks to these contextual
elements—regional, local, and community [15].
Previous studies in
Ethiopia that addressed the problem of homeless children is provided below at a
glance. Residents of Addis Ababa's Piassa neighbourhood were asked about their
thoughts on children playing in the street by Redea (2015). The study concludes
that social isolation did not exist and that youngsters living on the streets
were given good care. In Tigist's (2010) analysis, a number of extremely
difficult situations are faced by girls, including adult sexual assault, rape,
unintended pregnancies, and early motherhood - sometimes as early as 12 years
old. These girls will probably grow up to be street moms or child prostitutes,
continuing the cycle of homelessness. Gebre Medhin (2014) focused on the
difficulties of living on Addis Ababa's streets, revealing that young people
living on the streets face a variety of obstacles, including crime, poor water
and sanitation, psychological and physical health problems, and coping
mechanisms. Tatek (2000) asserts that children's misbehaviour, excitement, and
peer pressure are the main causes of streetism in Dessie. Sofiya & Geleta
(2019) determined the main causes of street children's existence in Harar City,
citing their incapacity to obtain employment and arguments with their parents
as the main causes. The aforementioned studies focused primarily on examining
the perspectives, experiences, and survival techniques of kids living on the
streets outside of Hawassa in Addis Abeba, Harar, and Dessie. In addition,
these studies tend to concentrate on a narrow aspect of the issue and have not
given much thought to the
fact that youth homelessness is more common. Most of the research did not
evaluate the causes, existing conditions, or impacts of streetism in its
entirety and in the context of Hawassa City. Furthermore, the number of street
children in Hawassa City, the seat of the Sidama Regional State, is increasing
despite the dearth of thorough studies on the topic. To provide a complete
picture of the trend, holes and blanks in the research should be filled.
Consequently, a detailed examination of the elements that push out children
from homes and draw them to the streets, their living conditions, and their
understanding of the consequences is needed in the research field.
Accordingly, this study was conducted to address the following research questions.
·
What are the major causes
of stretism?
·
What does the living
condition of street children look like?
·
What are the consequences
of streetism?
Methods
The
researchers employed the instrumental case study design, in qualitative
approach to examine the phenomenon of streetism and delve into its causes,
current state, and possible repercussions. Instrumental case study design is
preferred when the complexity of what is being studied suggests more can be
learnt by detailed exploration of an instant than surveying a representative
sample. This design deepens and expands our understanding of how the phenomenon
in our social world came to be the way they are [16]. The research topic was
addressed through the use of qualitative data collection techniques appropriate
for the case study design, including KII, FGD, and in-depth interviews [17].
These techniques allow the researchers to triangulate and combine the benefits
of multiple procedures, making up for the drawbacks of particular data
collection techniques [18]. The non-probability purposive sampling technique
was employed to choose the study participants, as there was no sample frame
available to choose from when choosing the street children. Because they
believe that law enforcement personnel and elderly people living on the streets
pose a threat, even they move swiftly between different corners of the street.
Using
a probability sampling technique with people whose whereabouts are erratic and
who are always moving present challenges. It was difficult to use a probability
sampling technique with people whose whereabouts are erratic and who move
around a lot [19]. Therefore, even though they were mobile, those with a wealth
of information and a high level of expertise about street children and their
lives were chosen to participate [4,20]. Also, the researchers relied on their
own tacit knowledge, sound judgment, and awareness of the subject matter. The
sample size of the study was decided when saturation of information was reached
after interviewing seven street children who work and live on the street for
over one year and above. In addition, 1 FGD was conducted: the FGD group
consisted of 5 members. Furthermore, four experts from the Hawassa city
Administration office of Labor and Social Affairs, Police, Center of concern
and Elshadai organization provided vital information about the causes, current
situation and consequences of street children. Consequently, the information
gathered from the subjects adhered to certain ethical guidelines, particularly
the preservation of the confidentiality and dignity of informants during study
as well as the keeping of the information in secure places to guard against
access. A variety of techniques, such as transcribing, familiarization, coding,
categorizing, structuring, and thematizing, were used to analyse and interpret
the data thematically [21]. Before starting data analysis, the researchers
became familiar with the data acquired through KII, FGD, and in-depth
interviews. These connected categories were categorized into primary themes
based on the study's research question, which defined the research subjects
[22]. In order to ensure the accuracy of the data collection and analysis, the
researchers also took a number of steps, including carefully choosing study
participants based on predetermined criteria, building rapport with interview
subjects, seeking expert opinion on the prepared interview guide, etc. Finally,
a debate that backed up the study's findings was consistent with other relevant
discoveries. The study's findings were then used to develop conclusions and
suggestions.
Research, understanding, and classification of street children pose significant challenges, despite their obvious presence to the uninitiated eye. Although every street child has a different background, the primary reasons for their misfortune and the effects they had on both the individual and society as a whole are always the same. The diagram depicted below illustrates how causes, present circumstances, and outcomes for children living on the streets have all been seen to be parts of street life.
Figure
1: Conceptual framework of the study.
Demographic characteristics of study participants
Note: Ten of the participants were male, and the remaining two were female. We can infer from this that the majority of street children in the study area were male. In terms of their place of birth, 75% of respondents were from different Zones of Sidama regional state, followed by the Woliyita zone and Gamogofa zone. When it comes to their educational background, nearly all of the respondents attended school, but none of them completed primary education.
Note:
As it is depicted (Table 1) 75% of the key informants were male and the rest
25% were female, as portrayed in the above table they have better knowledge and
understanding about the issue and they are technical experts that are
purposively pointed by the researcher by basing their significance to the
phenomenon under study.
S.N |
Pseudonym |
Sex |
Age |
Birth place |
Educational Level |
Duration on the street |
Remark |
1 |
R1 |
Male |
10 |
Gorche |
2 |
1 year |
Interview |
2 |
R2 |
Male |
13 |
Gorche |
4 |
2 years |
Interview |
3 |
R3 |
Male |
12 |
Shebedino |
3 |
2 years |
Interview |
4 |
R4 |
Male |
14 |
Wolayita |
6 |
3 years |
Interview |
5 |
R5 |
Female |
16 |
Boricha |
1 |
3 years |
Interview |
6 |
R6 |
Male |
15 |
Boricha |
2 |
1 year |
Interview |
7 |
R7 |
Male |
14 |
Boricha |
2 |
2 years |
Interview |
8 |
R8 |
Male |
16 |
Wolayita |
8 |
1 year |
FGD |
9 |
R9 |
Male |
13 |
Gorche |
4 |
2 years |
FGD |
10 |
R10 |
Male |
11 |
Gorche |
2 |
2 years |
FGD |
11 |
R11 |
Male |
8 |
Gamogofa |
1 |
1 year |
FGD |
12 |
R12 |
Female |
12 |
Boricha |
3 |
2 years |
FGD |
Table 2: Demographic characteristics of key informant.
S.N |
Pseudonym |
Sex |
Work
experience with streetism |
Position |
1 |
K1 |
Male |
6 years |
Counsellor in Center
of Concern |
2 |
K2 |
Male |
10 years |
Expert in police
office |
3 |
K3 |
Female |
3 years |
Project coordinator
at Elshadai |
4 |
K4 |
Male |
4 years |
Expert in Social
Affairs |
Causes of streetism
In
this study, streetism among children was caused by a number of causal elements.
The study's findings pointed to two subthemes as potential causes of youngsters
running away and becoming homeless. These are: push factors (poverty, family
dissolution, and domestic violence) and pull factors (perceived freedom, a
better quality of life, and peer influence).
Push factors
Poverty
The
majority of interviewees mentioned poverty as the major reason behind their
migration to the streets. This forced them to move out of their first house in
quest of a better life. Some families actively or passively push their kids to
move out. Respondents R2 and R7's narrative well illustrates this concept. R2
claimed that my father has absolutely nothing. He is unemployed. I have eight
sisters and brothers. We almost went against our beliefs and fasted for seven
days because they couldn't feed us. Due to all the inconveniences, I leave my
family and home to seek education and a stable income for me and my family.
Similar to R2, R7 claims that I go hungry most days; my family lacks the
resources to provide for their children's fundamental needs. This suggests that
children in the study area are driven to become homeless due to family
financial hardships and poverty.
Violence at Home
Growing
up in a family by witnessing violence presents difficult situations for
children. Parents become involved when there is domestic violence because the
spouse may be an alcoholic, for example. On the other hand, parents do
sometimes injure their children physically, psychologically, or sexually. Over
time, children reared in such situations often display anger, animosity, and
violent behaviour [23-34]. Either because they must escape their abusive homes
or because they fear they will inherit similar conduct from their parents,
children who flee to the streets do so. The following example illustrates this:
According
to R5, my father always gets into arguments with my mom and other family
members and when he starts banging things over, I'm pretty certain we'll get
insulted and beaten. We usually go to sleep with our neighbours to get away
from this. I finally resolved to leave my father's verbal abuse behind and join
the streets.
In
similar manner R6 adds that difficulties, fights, and nagging are inevitable
parts of life and that he always drinks a lot. He likes to cause trouble,
complain, and quarrel, so I constantly felt depressed and made the decision to
join the street life. From the aforementioned child statements violence as
potential causes of streetism that facilitate flee.
Family dissolution
Children
end up on the streets as a result of family-related issues such family
dissolution, restructuring of the family system, or living with stepparents and
stepchildren. The example below demonstrates this:
As
of R4 my parents' disintegration is unknown to me, ………. My father is with
another woman after the divorce, and they had two kids together. Our stepmother
was not good to us, especially because she was so nasty and treated my sister
and I like slaves. She consistently provides me instructions…………. She was
physically and psychologically mistreating us. As a result, I join street life.
Thus, family dissolution was among the triggering causes that lead children to
join street life.
Pull factors
Perceived freedom
Understanding
about the concept of freedom based on our cognitive capacity, children also
flee to street life because they think that they will enjoy freedom because of
living home. The following idea debriefs the issue:
I
was born in Boricha, and as of R3, I had a brother and a sister. Both my father
and mother are daily labourers. In our household, there is no financial
problem. Our home is equipped with what we require. But every time I see
children on the street, they always seem happy and behave as they choose. Then,
as I began to adore them, I left the house in search of independence,
influenced by my newfound street friends. This suggests that another reason why
some kids leave their families' homes is to pursue what they consider to be
freedom.
Peer influence
Clique-friendship
circles with members who identify with one another and sharing a sense of
identity are prevalent kind of peer influence for kids. According to the
information gathered from interviews and FGD, peer influence was among the
reasons for streetism. The issue is better illustrated in the following
narrative:
R1
proves that when my friends visit Gena (Christmas), I observe change in him
more he's mature, dressed formally, and speaks excellent Amharic. He and I
spoke on the phone. He adamantly asserted that life in Hawassa is appealing,
and he counselled me to follow his example and: left my house on the
recommendation of a friend.
From the narrative above, it can be inferred that one of the contributing factors to youngsters ending up on the streets is peer pressure. The focus group discussion's findings also showed that the main causes of their being in the middle of the street were poverty, family divorce, peer pressure, freedom, and the desire for a better life.
In
addition, a discussion with K2 disclosed that the main factor contributing to
kid streetism in the study region is poverty. The size of the household and
inadequate parenting also had a significant impact on children being exposed to
the streets. Peer pressure and urbanization were two other important pull
factors.
Situation of the street
children
On
the basis of the interview and FGD, the researcher identified three sub themes,
namely livelihood stability, life transitions on the street, and time spent on
the streets, each theme was discussed as follows.
Livelihood
security
The
findings provide evidence that having experience on the streets is necessary to
make a living wage. They cannot compete for occupations that will allow them to
support themselves because they lack the necessary urban-based skills. They
engage in more unlawful and informal activities in order to make a meagre
living. The problem is summed up in the narrative that follows:
R7
demonstrates that my favourite days were Monday and Thursday. I feel fairly
secure in my ability to choose what to eat and how much sleep to pay for.
Because Hawassa is having a market day. I will carry a variety of bags for
customers who visited the market. In line with R7, R2 also demonstrates that he
will be content during market days by getting employment, which will allow him
to sell Bonda (second-hand) clothing in the marketplace.
The
aforementioned story debriefs that Market days were good day chosen by most
street children to secure their livelihood. Participants in the FGD also noted
that the main sources of income for street children include begging, car
washing, street vending, temporary jobs in markets, collecting plastic debris
for sale, fishing, shoe-shining, lugging heavy items in the market, and selling
newspapers. Lemena, or begging, is the primary tactic used by street children
as of the K4 to ensure their livelihood. For economically deprived street
children, scavenging, or "qefefa," is a means of survival. They beg
at public places like as churches, mosques, shops, markets, restaurants,
crowded street areas, traffic lights, and any nearby house. Through personal
networks, atekelet-tera (vegetable market), and merekeb (trash bin), they
scavenge from restaurants, bars, and hotels. In a mobile search from kebele to
kebele, in trash cans, by the side of the road, and other filthy container
sakes, they gathered various metal fragments, plastic materials, glasses,
clothing, shoes, and other essential things.
Life transition in
street
Settlement
in street life is accompanied with transition as per the obtained data; the
settlement at the beginning and being senior has quite complete variation. The
story below clearly debriefs the issue. R1 said that after three weeks of
living there after moving from Adissu Menehariya to Gebeya on the advice of
friends, I spent approximately eight months there before settling down near
Tabor Elementary School, which is the greatest place for me to reside. In a
similar vein, R3 also claims that I spent a few days in Aroge Menehariya before
moving to Gebeya and settling there after being heavily into drugs. Based on the above story there is strata in
life transition in street life which suits fresh as well seniors. Participants
in the FGD confirm that newcomers initially settle in the Menehariya
neighbourhood. After getting to know the city and making friends, the majority
of us will move to Gebeya in order to secure a livelihood. If we are
substance-free, we choose to live near Tabor Elementary; if we use drugs, we
prefer the Piasa and Haik Dar neighbourhoods. According to k3, Menehariya is
for new comers, Gebeya is for people who like to work and where young kids
congregate near Tabor Elementary, and the remainder of the addicts and drug
users congregate around Piasa and Haik Dar.
Time spent on the
street
According
to information gathered from interviewees, street children in the study area
spent their time by engaging in a variety of activities: playing with friends,
visiting Drop In Rehabilitation Centre (DIRC), visiting movie theatres,
working, sniffing glue and benzene, and using psychoactive substances were the
main hassles they engaged in. The situation is well portrayed in the following
narrative. Answerer R4 I am fine during the day because I have a lot to do,
like working, playing with my friends, going to the DIRC to clean, and watch
movies, but the night is terrible because there are so many abuses and scary
things to see. Each and every one of us could be abused at night. In agreement
with R4, R6 demonstrates that while the night is terrible, I prefer the day
because I get to work around Menehariya, visit Gebeya, go to the DIRC, and
shine shoes. From the above story we can sum they enjoy day time and they have
a plenty of to do and nights were challenging in street life. Participants in
the FGD also demonstrate that they spend their free time in working, playing
with children, visiting the DIRC, sniffing glue and benzene, and abusing
psychoactive substances. In comparison to the night, days are safer. K1 reveals
that they spend their time using drugs, playing, watching different movies, and
working for various service providers.
Consequences of
streetism
Under
sub theme three, the researcher identified four sub themes namely health
effect, violence, substance usage and involvement in crime and each theme were
debriefed as follows.
Health Effect
Street
life exposes people to health issues. Their needs are typically met by leftover
food and clothing. They brought stuff from garages, health centres, and garbage
cans from the west. The scenario portrayed by R7 as follows:
I
almost eat the leftovers (bule). When I buy things from hotels, I usually
experience stomach ache. I always go to the clinic with a DIRC referral paper,
and the doctors warned me not to eat the leftover food, but I have to do it to
survive. I would much rather experience discomfort from leftover food than
domestic abuse. As reported by interviewee health of a child is affected
seriously because of street life.
Violence
Everyone
in Hawassa has the ability to abuse us, ranging from mild to severe levels. Of
the interviewees, verbal and physical abuses were the most often reported forms
of abuse. The issue is succinctly illustrated in the following anecdote of R5.
I almost spent the night next to the police station to avoid having sex with
them, they frequently raped me in chorus, I had pain and children as a result
of the frequent rapes, and I almost feel depressed by my life on the street.
However, because I have no one to look out for me, I will continue to face the
challenges of living on the streets as long as the abuse persists. As reported
by children’s violence in different form were prevalent in street life.
Substance usage
The
majority of the informants in the information gathered from interviews claimed
to be addicted to at least one kind of psychoactive substance when it came to
the substance use of street children. As a result, the most popular substances
utilized by street youngsters were chewing gum, smoking, sniffing glue, and
utilizing plastic. R2 claims that on the street starving and getting cold is
common, start glue sniffing, benzene and smoking cigarette to get relief from
starving and getting cold at night. Substance abuse is among the most
conspicuous consequences with child streetism.
Involvement in
crime
Street
youngsters typically steal in numerous ways. Different strategies are employed
to gain the upper hand during the day or at night by utilizing force. The issue
is briefly shown in the story of R7 that follows. Getting better through
practice Thanks to my pal, I learned how to steal effectively, and these days I
get a lot of flak for my actions. However, I make a lot of money as a result of
my engagement, which helps me to ignore any doubts I may have about my
involvement in illegal operations. I nearly started using drugs regularly. As
reported by children’s for securing livelihood they will be in the middle of
crime. Participants in the FGD also mention the negative effects of street
culture, with engagement in crime and health issues topping the list. Chebu
(stealing by force), Menchu (run away by snatching) and Gechito Yekirta (smash
and excuse) were the major techniques used for theft which are identified by
FGD participants.
The
findings suggest several causes for why children in Hawassa City end up living
on the streets. The results of this study are in line with most other
scientific research on street children that has been done in the past. For
instance, Njeru (1989) noted in research on family-related concerns that
because they lack a consistent source of income, a large number of street
children must leave their homes in order to meet their basic needs. Since their
families have failed them, children must take care of their basic requirements.
In addition, a 2008 study by Densely and Joss discovered that a significant
percentage of families were in disarray and that the number of urban street
children had increased to concerning levels. According to the research, there are
a number of reasons why kids in Hawassa City end up living on the streets.
Consistent with this study are the findings of the majority of scientific
studies conducted to date on street children. For example, Njeru's (1989) study
on family-related issues revealed that many street children leave their homes
in order to meet their fundamental needs because their families do not make a
standard wage. Since the family has collapsed, it is imperative that children
take care of their basic needs. In addition, Densely and Joss's (2008) study
found that a number of families were in disarray and that the number of urban
street children had risen to alarming proportions.
As it is revealed in this study Begging, street vendor, temporary work in market places, collecting plastic wastes to sell, fishing, shoe shining, carrying luggage and heavy things in the market and selling newspaper were the major activities carried out by street children to secure livelihood. Similar to this study, Zena and Aneth (2010) discovered that many rely on stealing, begging, or low-paying occupations in the unofficial economy to make ends meet. To add, Gobena (1994) discovered that in order to make ends meet, homeless persons take up informal jobs. Street selling, rubbish collection, and casual day labour in the construction industry are common sources of income. While teenage guys might work as casual labourers during the day or shine shoes if they have the money to purchase a kit, women often perform household chores like laundry and injera making. According to Densely and Josh (2008), chewing "chat" gum, smoking cigarettes, sniffing glue, and using plastic are all included. Even so, they progress to start smoking hashish and marijuana while feigning to overcome various issues they encounter, such as hunger, cold, fear, and loneliness on the streets. According to this research, street children are also more likely to experience health issues, violence, substance abuse, and criminal activity as a result of living on the streets.
The findings of this study showed that, children flee to street life because of poverty, violence at home, and family dissolution, perceived freedom, and peer influence were the major triggering factor in the study area. Begging, washing cars and shop windows, street vendor, temporary work in market places, collecting plastic wastes to sell, fishing, shoe shining, carrying luggage and heavy things in the market and selling newspaper were the major activities carried out by street children to secure livelihood. As it is revealed in the study there is life transition in street life which suits fresh as well seniors. Street children in the study area spend their time by working, playing with children, visiting the DIRC, sniffing glue and benzene, and abusing psychoactive substances. As a result of being on the street they expose themselves to health, violence, substance usage and engagement in criminal act.
Based on the study's findings, the following recommendations are forwarded:
· Direct or indirect involvement of various actors is required. These players include faith-based, community-based, government, and non-governmental groups.
· Policies for social development and poverty reduction should be implemented to enhance the general state of the community with particular emphasis on street children and families in the lowest socioeconomic status.
· There should be a coordinated campaign to raise awareness, as well as efforts to create jobs, educate the public, advocate for important stakeholders, and improve education and other essential services.