Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Yildirim AI, Karaagac AT, Usta SA, Arisut S, Ceyran H and Sungur M
Keywords : Vascular plugs; cardiovascular shunt; Vascular malformation; Vascular occlusion
A wide variety of abnormal congenital or
acquired vascular connections, which may lead to intra/extracardiac shunts,
heart failure, and cyanosis, require closure. These are natural communications
such as patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), aortopulmonary collateral artery
(APCA), pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM), ventricular septal defect
(VSD), atrial septal defect (ASD), or unwanted shunt or communications created
or developed after surgery [1-8]. The number of surgically treated congenital
heart disease (CHD) cases, some of which require recurrent surgical or
angiographic procedures, has been increasing every day. Patients with single
ventricle physiology or major APCA dependent pulmonary circulation are more
prone to develop vascular anomalies. Fontan and Glenn shunt surgeries may
result in abnormal vascular connections or pulmonary arterial flow leading to
increased pulmonary pressure. Transcatheter closure may be applied to these
patients as an alternative to surgery [2]. Since the first interventional
closure of PDA by Porstmann in 1967, occluder devices have been substantially
improved. These advanced devices have enabled the closure of various congenital
and acquired vascular abnormalities, shunts, abnormal venovenous connections,
surgical shunts, and other miscellaneous lesions. Many centres have preferred
AVP2 and AVP4 for the closure of abnormal vascular structures since CE-mark
approved their clinical use in 2007 and 2009. They are of self-expanding and
low profile nature comprising two (AVP4) and three (AVP2) fine mesh lobes of
Nitinol wire. Platinum marker bands at the ends make the device highly visible
under fluoroscopy [7]. The AVP4 is available in 4-8 mm diameters (1-mm
increments) and AVP2 in 3-22 mm (>4 mm diameter, 2-mm increments). The
AVP4’s profile is slim enough to require a 5F diagnostic catheter. However,
having a limited available size up to 4-8mm is a big disadvantage of this
device. It can only be used for vessels smaller than 6 mm. AVP2 devices can be
deployed through 5Fr guide for sizes 3-8 mm, and 6-9Fr guide for the largest
sizes 18-22 m [4].
We conducted a
retrospective analysis of 0.6 to 21-year-old (median: 7.5years) 16 patients, 6
males and 10 female patients, who underwent vascular occlusion procedure with
AVP2 and AVP4 in our institution between 2015 and 2019. 18 AVP2 and 7 AVP4
devices were used in 25 target vessels. Urgent closure was required for three
of them, whereas the other 22 were elective procedures. Target blood vessels
were demonstrated by angiograms. The diameters of the narrowest segments were
chosen as the reference. The ratio of device size to the vessel diameter was
calculated. Devices were selected to be 30-50% larger in size for the complete
occlusion. The size and number of devices were recorded. The mean
device-to-vessel ratio was also recorded. AVP2 was used to occlude extracardiac
shunt, large PAVM, and medium to large high flow tubular vascular structures,
and AVP4 for tortious, elongated, and small vessels. All the interventions were
performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia. Patients received 50-100
IU/kg heparin throughout the procedure. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis was
administered to all patients. The primary occlusion rate was checked for every
implanted device. The pulmonary arterial pressures, cutaneous oxygen saturation
of the patients were recorded before and after closure. Besides, the urinary
output and the dosage of inotropic support of the patients followed in the
intensive care unit were recorded. Any device or procedure-related complaints
or complications were also documented. The study was approved by the
Institute’s Ethics Committee. Informed, written consent was obtained from all
participants/parents.
A total of 25 AVPs were successfully implanted, 18 of them with AVP2 (72%) and 7 of them with AVP4 (28%), in 16 patients. The mean device-to-vessel ratio was 1.46 for AVP2 and 1.55 for AVP4. Patients’ characteristics, diagnoses, and details about the closure with AVP’s were listed in Tables 1 and 2. Most of the patients had biventricular physiology. The major indications for AVP use included the closure of APCA (52%), PAVM (20%), pulmonary antegrade flow (8%) and venovenous communication after Norwood stage 2 (4%), Scimitar vein (4%), excluded hepatic vein (right atria-hepatic vein communication) after Fontan completion (4%), PDA (4%) and residual VSD (4%) (Table 1,2).
Table 1: Patient’s characteristics.
Age Of The Patients (Years) |
Gender (F/M) |
Diagnosis of closure |
Type of the
Closed Vessel |
Closure Indication |
Outcome |
4 |
F |
Corrective surgery VSD- APCA-PA |
Residual APCA |
CHF, RF |
Inotropic
support decreased and extubated |
5 |
F |
Corrective surgery VSD- APCA-PA |
Residual APCA |
Pulmonary
haemorrhage, CHF,
RF |
Inotropic
support decreased and extubated |
4 |
M |
VSD -PA-APCA |
APCA |
Preparation
corrective surgery |
Operated |
1 |
M |
Tetralogy of Fallot |
APCA |
|
Operated |
2 |
M |
Glenn
operation, functional single ventricle |
Pulmonary
antegrade flow |
Head
and neck edema |
Mean
pulmonary pressure decreased 19mmHg to
12mmHg |
10 |
F |
Fontan surgery |
Pulmonary antegrade
flow |
Dyspnea, fatigue |
Increased effort capacity |
13 |
F |
Fontan surgery |
RA-HV communication |
Cyanosis |
sO2
increased from 80%
to 92% |
3 |
F |
Glenn shunt- Single Ventricle |
APCA |
Preparation Fontan |
Fontan completed |
4 |
M |
Norwood Stage 2, HLHS |
APCA |
Preparation Fontan |
Fontan completed |
2 |
M |
Norwood Stage 2, HLHS |
APCA |
Preparation Fontan |
Fontan completed |
21 |
F |
Kawashima operation, functional
single ventricle |
PAVM |
Deep cyanosis |
sO2
increased from 60%
to 90% |
12,16* |
F |
Congenital PAVM |
PAVM |
Cyanosis, Clubbing |
sO2
increased from 80%
to 98% |
16 |
M |
MVR,
residual Swiss cheese
VSD |
VSD |
Dyspnoea, fatigue |
Increased effort capacity |
7 |
F |
PAH-MAPCA |
APCA |
Dyspnoea, fatigue |
Increased effort capacity |
3 |
F |
Scimitar Syndrome |
Scimitar vein and artery- |
Effort dyspnoea |
Increased effort capacity |
17 |
F |
PDA |
PDA |
Effort dyspnoea |
Increased effort capacity |
CHF: congestive heart
failure, HLHS: hypoplastic left heart syndrome, F: Female. M: Male, APCA:
aorto-opulmonary collateral artery, MVR: mitral valve replacement, PA:
pulmonary atresia, PAVM: pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, PDA: patent
ductus arteriosus, PAH: pulmonary arterial
hypertension, RF: renal failure, VSD: ventricular septal defect *closed twice for the 12
and 16 years old (3 devices) |
Table 2: Types of AVP devices and the indications of plug choice.
Site Intervention |
No. of vessel |
Type of device |
No. Of devices |
Device size (mm) |
Closure dimater (mm) |
Device /vessel Ratio (mm) |
APCA |
13(52%) |
AVP 2 AVP 4 |
9 4 |
6-14 4, 5, 6 and 8 |
6.5 (4.1-9,6) 3.8 (2.3-5.3) |
1,50 (1.39-1.71) 1.48 (1,31-1.67) |
PAVM |
5
(20%) |
AVP 2
AVP 4 |
3
2 |
10,
12 and 22 7
and 8 |
11.4(8.2-14.7) 4.7(4.2-5.3) |
1.47(1.46-1.49 1.58(.151-1.66) |
Pulmonary Valve |
2(8%) |
AVP 2 |
2 |
8
and 9 |
5.8(5.2-6.4) |
1.45(1.40-1.53) |
Scimiter
Vein |
1(4%) |
AVP 2 |
1 |
14 |
9.1 |
1.53 |
Azygos
Vein |
1(4%) |
AVP 4 |
1 |
7 |
4.7 |
1.60 |
Exluded Hepatic
Vein |
1(4%) |
AVP2 |
1 |
12 |
9 |
1.33 |
PDA |
1(4%) |
AVP2 |
1 |
4 |
2.65 |
1.50 |
Residual
apical VSD |
1(4%) |
AVP 2 |
1 |
20 |
13 |
1.53 |
APCA:
aorto-pulmonary collateral artery PAVM: pulmonary arteriovenous malformation,
PDA: patent ductus arteriosus, VSD: ventricular septal defect. |
APCA closure was performed
by placing 14 devices (10 AVP2 and 4 AVP4) into 13 vessels in seven patients.
Three of them had VSD with pulmonary atresia, two patients had Tetralogy of
Fallot, one patient had normal intracardiac anatomy with pulmonary arterial
hypertension (PAH), and one patient had scimitar syndrome. All 13 vessels were
completely occluded by angiography. Two patients underwent emergency
intervention. Pulmonary hemorrhage, renal insufficiency, and heart failure
resistant to inotropic agents developed in two patients following the
corrective surgery of pulmonary atresia-VSD-major APCA. Large residual APCAs
were detected and occluded totally by AVP2 devices. The hemodynamic parameters
of the patients improved after the closure. 2 large APCAs were detected in the angiography
of another case which we followed in our outpatient clinic due to PAH without
congenital heart disease. The mPAP decreased from 78 mmHg to 46 mmHg after the
occlusion of these vessels by two AVP4 devices. There was no change in mPAP in
the control angiography performed four years after the closure. The patient had
been receiving both iloprost inhalation and bosentan treatment before the
procedure. She has been followed asymptomatically by only bosentan treatment
since the closure.
Two patients underwent
occlusion of PAVM. A total of four devices were placed in four PAVMs and all of
them were successfully occluded. One patient had a normal cardiac structure,
but a large PAVM was detected in the right pulmonary middle lobe. After the
occlusion of this PAVM by a 22mm AVP2 device, an extra PAVM was detected at the
proximal side of the occluded vessel in the control injection. The device was
recaptured three times successfully and repositioned until the two PAVMs were
occluded. The oxygen saturation was raised from 80% to 99% by the closure.
However, this patient was admitted to the hospital with a complaint of cyanosis
4 years after the procedure. In the pulmonary angiography, enlargement of the
PAVMs that were previously small and new PAVMs were observed. The oxygen
saturation increased after the closure of the right lung lower lobe fistulas by
12mm and 10mm AVP2 and 10mm devices (Figure 1,2).
In another case, who developed cyanosis after the Kawashima operation, two PAVMs detected in the catheter angiography were occluded by 8 and 7mm AVP 4 devices. Her oxygen saturation raised from 66% to 85% after the occlusion. The hepatic veins of the patient were anastomosed surgically to the pulmonary system after her physical condition improved.
Figure 1: Multiple arteriovenous malformations in the middle (giant) and lower lobes (black arrows) were detected in the right pulmonary artery injection to a 12- year-old patient.
Figure 2: Angiocardiography
performed 4 years later, because of an increase in the patient's cyanosis,
showed enlargement in the previously small aneurysms.
Two patients underwent
pulmonary ante grade flow closure with AVP2 devices. One of these cases had
developed superior vena cava syndrome while being followed in the intensive
care unit after the Glenn shunt operation. The pulmonary ante grade flow was
closed by 8mm AVP 2, thereby decreasing the mean pulmonary arterial pressure
(mPAP) from 19 mmHg to 12 mmHg. The other case with the pulmonary ante grade flow
after Fontan circulation was closed by a 9mm AVP2 device (Figure 3,4).
In a 6-year-old patient with Scimitar Syndrome with impaired right pulmonary artery peripheric perfusion, a 14mm AVP2 device was used to close the Scimitar vein. The patient has had no symptoms for the last 5 years. Azygos vein-inferior vena cava communication was detected in the catheter angiography of another patient, 3-year-old with Norwood stage 2 operation, before the Fontan operation.
Figure 3: Pulmonary antegrade flow before closure.
Figure 4: Pulmonary antegrade flow after closure.
This vein was closed by 7 mm AVP4. As no increase was detected in the PA pressure in the control angiography of the patient, Fontan operation could be performed 6 months later from the closure. A 10-year-old girl presented with fatigue and oxygen saturation of 80% following the Fontan completion surgery. Direct transhepatic access into the excluded hepatic vein by angiography demonstrated a large right to left shunt from the left side of the liver, as well as left middle collateral veins entering into the right atrium. After the test balloon occlusion, a 12-mm AVP2 was delivered inside the excluded vein, the first lob was seated on the floor of the right atrium, and the other two lobs were situated by pulling towards the hepatic veins. Control angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the excluded vein. After this communication was completely closed by 12mm AVP2, the oxygen saturation increased from 80% to 92%. The large residual Swiss cheese apical muscular VSD of a 14-year-old patient was closed by 20 mm AVP2. The echocardiography performed a week later from the closure showed an improvement in the left ventricular functions and the effort capacity of the patient (ejection fraction increased from 55% to 65%). A patient's long tubular PDA was closed with 4mm AVP2. We observed no inadvertent device-related obstruction of neighboring vessels, nor any device embolization, vascular disruption, or any other procedure-related complication. Angiographic evidence of mild residual shunt was observed in three patients after the closure with AVP4, which disappeared in the control contrast agent injection performed after 10 minutes (Figure 5,6).
Figure 5: 10-year-old girls, the
inferior cava vein angiography demonstrated hepatic vein-right atria
communication (black arrow).
Figure 6: Control
angiography after the closure by12mm AVP2. Black arrow indicated AVP2 devices.
The device was placed through the femoral venous
or arterial access. In three patients, a jugular approach and carotid artery
were used. In two of these patients, with modified Glenn shunt, the right
jugular vein was preferred to close the ante grade flow. As it was not possible
to reach the APCA’s, developed after the surgical correction of pulmonary
atresia-VSD-major APCA, of the third patient through the femoral artery, the
right carotid artery was used to reach the target vessel. The most common
catheter used for plug delivery was the 5Fr guiding catheter, 6, 7, 9Fr flexor
sheath (cook), and Amplatzer duct occlude delivery. In cases where the position
was not suitable after the opening of the device, it was recaptured and placed
repeatedly. We didn’t observe any deformity or problem with the configuration
of AVP devices during repeated applications. The radiopaque band on both sides
of the device provided us a better view of the device. After 10 minutes of
deployment, no residual flow was observed. Successful deployment of the device
and complete flow occlusion across the vessel could be achieved in all
patients.
Transcatheter closure
may be preferred as an alternative to surgery in native, postoperatively
developed, or surgically created vascular malformations. The experiences of
AVPs have been increasing since its first introduction [5,6]. One of the first
studies about the use of AVP devices was a multicenter study. The indications
for the use of AVP1 in this study were collaterals, fistulas, transhepatic
tracts, central shunts, PDA, and excluded hepatic vein. AVP1 was the most
common device used before AVP 2 became available for clinical use. Then AVP2
has become the most commonly used type due to its better occlusive properties.
A study about the use of AVP1 and AVP2 devices for closure of PDA, venous
collateral, APCA, Modified BT shunt, portosystemic communication, and
miscellaneous. Their institution preferred AVP 2 for occlusion procedures due
to its occlusive properties and lower profile design. In another study where
AVPs were mostly used for the closure of extracardiac (pulmonary or systemic
circulation and aortopulmonary collaterals) and intracardiac (coronary AVM and
pulmonary valve closure) shunts, AVP 2 was preferred more. There are some
unusual indications, such as the closure of left pulmonary artery
pseudoaneurysm, pulmonary antegrade flow, and baffle leak after Fontan
completion, partially ligated vertical veins of the patients with the diagnosis
of supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and post-infarct
VSD, where AVP1 and AVP2 were successfully used for closure rather than surgery
[9-11]. Unusual indication that they used a 16mm AVP 1 device for the closure
of excluded hepatic vein after Fontan completion and then experienced 16-14 ADO
device upon the maintenance of a residual shunt. We closed an excluded hepatic
vein-right atria communication using a single 12mm AVP 2 device without
residual shunt or protrusion into the surrounding tissues. Scimitar syndrome is
a rare congenital anomaly treated surgically by ligation or occlusion of the
aberrant vascular supply after changing the route of the scimitar vein to the
left atrium. A patient in whom they used transcatheter route to occlude the
isolated scimitar vein, camouflaged by dual pulmonary venous drainage of the
right lung, by an Amplatzer ductal occlude in an ante grade way [12]. An
interventional treatment via complete rerouting of anomalous venous drainage to
the left atrium using AVP and embolization of aberrant vascular supply [13].
Our Scimitar syndrome case had no right pulmonary arterial perfusion as a rare
presentation and her Scimitar vein and abnormal vascular supply were occluded
by AVP 2 device, without surgery. Residual APCA, which may rarely be seen
following the corrective surgery of pulmonary atresia-VSD-major APCA, should be
remembered if the heart failure symptoms are refractory to aggressive cardiac
support, including epinephrine infusion, in the early post-surgical period
[14]. Hemodynamic instability developed in 2 of our patients in the early
postoperative period of unifocalization. We urgently closed their large
aortopulmonary collateral arteries by AVP2 device. Although APCA’s usually
accompany congenital heart diseases, they may rarely be seen as isolated cases
and cause pulmonary hypertension. One of our rare presentations was pulmonary
hypertension due to the isolated APCA’s without a CHD. The mean PAP decreased
after the closure of APCA’s by AVP4 and the dual (inhaled iloprost and
bosentan) treatment of this patient was maintained only by bosentan. It is very
important to close the PAVMs completely. The shape (simple or complex),
diameter (>3mm, small or large), the neck, and triplet regions of the
malformed vessels should be very carefully determined to achieve a complete
closure [15-18]. As the recanalization of the large vessels after the coil
application is a well-known phenomenon, used AVP1 and coil together for the
complete closure of the PAVM’s >5mm. They didn’t experience recanalization
in any of the patients by this technique. AVPs have rapidly become the
preferred device for embolization compared with a coil. Advantages include the
ability to occlude large-diameter feeding arteries with single plugs, with less
procedure time and radiation exposure, easier occlusion at the neck of the
sack, and occlusion over a shorter length of the vessel, thereby reducing the
risk of occluding vessels supplying normal lung. In our case, three feeding
arteries were closed completely by using only a single AVP 2 device to the neck
region of the giant and complex PAVM. AVP2 may be preferred to achieve complete
closure of the cases with large and complex vascular structures. However, it
was observed that there were a large number of PAVMs in pulmonary angiography
performed due to an increase in cyanosis 4 years later. The biggest PAVM was
closed. Therefore, we suggest a close follow up of these patients for the
development of new PAVMs. As already recommended to minimize the risk of
residual shunting and AVP closure, it is important to use 30-50% larger plugs
concerning the target vessel. Our device/vessel ratio was a median of 1.55 for
AVP4 and 1.46 for AVP2, both resulting in an occlusion rate of 100% in the
catheter laboratory. These differences may be explained by the AVP’s
architecture: the AVP 4 has a multi-layered, double-lobed design, whereas the
AVP 2 is multi-layered and three-lobed, which enables faster vessel occlusion
due to more wire mesh.
In this study, we
wanted to share our experiences about the use of different forms of excellently
designed AVP devices in various clinical manifestations. AVP2 consists of a
nitinol meshwork that allows the closure of intracardiac shunts and large, high
flow vascular structures, a trilobate structure allowing faster occlusion with
a single device, and minimizing migration and recanalization. A single device
can achieve complete occlusion in large, abnormally shaped vessels, residual
ventricular septal defects, and pulmonary antegrade flow and excluded hepatic
veins. AVP4 requires only a 5F diagnostic catheter and easy deliverability
makes it suitable for tortuous and small vessels. As the AVPs are simple,
effective, and easy to apply devices, they provide exact, reliable, and
cost-effective occlusion of targeted vessels in various clinical situations in
selected cases without a significant complication.