Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Dada FL, Azeke MA, Iweka FK, Festus OO, Omolumen LE, Osuji KC, Onuoha AC, Innih RE, Nwankwo CC, Olubori SO, Eigbedion AO, Obohwemu KO
Keywords : Values are mean ± standard deviation, Values (represented as Bar charts) are mean, while error bars are standard deviations, Values in a group with different alphabetical superscript are significantly different at P<0.05
Objective: This study investigated the
antioxidant activities and antidiabetic potentials of Anchomanes difformis root
extract by evaluating its enzymatic antioxidant activities (catalase,
superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase), malondiadehyde and
non-enzymatic antioxidant activities (DPPH, ABTS and hydroxyl radical
scavenging). Additionally, the extract’s ability to inhibit alpha-amylase and
alpha-glucosidase enzymes was assessed.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-four (24)
adult male albino rats (Wistar strain) weighing within the ranges of 150–250 g
were used for the antidiabetic study. All rats were randomly divided into four
groups. All groups were treated with the following regimen for twenty-one (21)
days. The normal control (NC) Group 1 and diabetic control (DC) Group 11 were
fed on normal feed and water ad libitum throughout the period. Diabetic rats
Groups III and IV received aqueous and ethanol extracts of A. difformis at a dose
of 500mg/kg body weight respectively.
Results: The extract showed significant
(P<0.05) increase in activities of SOD, GPX and CAT and significant
(P<0.05) reduction in MDA level of treated diabetic rats. The extract also
exhibited significant antioxidant activity, as demonstrated by its ability to
scavenge DPPH, ABTS, and hydroxyl radicals. Additionally, the extract showed
potential inhibition of alpha glucosidase activity in a concentration dependent
manner and moderate inhibition of alpha amylase activity, suggesting its
potential as a natural antidiabetic agent. These findings highlight the
potential of Anchomanes difformis root extract as a natural therapeutic agent
for managing diabetes mellitus and related oxidative stress disorder.
One of those native medicinal plants, Anchomanes difformis, has been used by traditional herbalists to cure a variety of ailments and disorders. It is a member of the ARACEAE family. In English, it is referred to as woodland Anchomanes. It is a prickly-stemmed herbaceous plant [1,2]. The genus Anchomaness difformis a large herbaceous plant is a member of the Aracaea family. It is a significant medicinal plant that grows in tropical regions throughout Africa, but it is particularly prevalent in West African forests [3]. It is a substantial herbaceous plant. According to Dalziel [4], the plant root is also referred to as Chakara (Hausa) in Northern Nigeria, Oje in Eastern Nigeria, and Ishu agan (Yoruba) in South Western Nigeria. Locals frequently refer to it as bush cocoyam [5]. A root decoction is used to cure diabetes mellitus, according to ethno-medicinal information from herbal practitioners in Zaria, Nigeria. The root or tuber is used as a diuretic and to treat diabetes mellitus in the Republic of Benin. There is currently no scientific evidence to back up this assertion. Additionally, it has been stated that the powdered root of Anchomanes difformis combined with palm oil is used as a treatment for respiratory illnesses in children in Zaire (DRC) and South Western Nigeria, respectively. The herb is also said to possess anti-microbial qualities [6,7]. The oldest kind of medicine known to humans is the usage of herbs, which has been used throughout history in all civilizations [8]. About 80% of the world's population, particularly in developing and undeveloped nations, uses herbal medicine as their major source of health care due to poverty and restricted access to modern medicine [9]. Herbal remedies are not available in government healthcare facilities, despite the widespread usage of herbal medicine in the delivery of healthcare in nations like Nigeria and the accessibility of medicinal herbs in local markets. This may be partially caused by a lack of sufficient knowledge and thorough scientific investigation of the most widely utilized herbal remedies. Anchomanes difformis is a plant that has long been employed as an herbal remedy in traditional medicine. A decoction of the herb is used to cure diabetes among other illnesses, according to ethno-medicinal information from herbal practitioners in Zaria City, Nigeria [10]. This assertion cannot be verified or supported scientifically.
A series of metabolic illnesses known as diabetes
mellitus are defined by hyperglycaemia caused by deficiencies in insulin
secretion, action, or both. According to Adams et al, [11], long-term damage,
dysfunction, and failure of many organs, particularly the eyes, kidneys,
nerves, heart, and blood arteries, are linked to the chronic hyperglycaemia of
diabetes. An estimated 537 million persons worldwide are projected to have
diabetes mellitus, with a global prevalence of 10.5 percent among adults aged
20 to 79. Diabetes Atlas, IDF, 2021. Approximately 90% of diabetes diagnoses
worldwide are for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [12]. The World Health
Organization (WHO) estimates that 3% of the world's population currently has
diabetes; by 2025, this percentage is projected to quadruple [13]. Rapid
urbanization, westernization, and the ensuing lifestyle modifications are some
of the factors contributing to this expected increase. Another component
causing this threat is genetic predisposition [14]. In
DM, oxidative stress has a number of detrimental impacts on cellular
physiology. For the islet, one of the tissues with the lowest levels of
intrinsic antioxidant defence, this is particularly significant and harmful.
Numerous biochemical routes and mechanisms of action have been connected to the
deleterious effects of chronic hyperglycemia and oxidative stress on the
functionality of vascular, retinal, and renal tissues [15]. Cellular damage brought on by
hyperglycaemia is significantly influenced by oxidative stress. Free radical
generation can be stimulated by high glucose levels. A situation of imbalance
between ROS and their protection occurs as a result of the body's weak defence
system's inability to counteract the increased ROS creation, which leads to the
dominance of the condition of oxidative stress [16]. Since oxidative stress and
ROS have a variety of regulatory functions in cells, they are required in small
amounts for proper metabolic activities. In order to get rid of antigens,
neutrophils and macrophages create ROS during the respiratory burst process
[17]. Additionally, they serve as signals that promote the expression of
several genes that code for transcription factors, differentiation, and
development as well as genes that stimulate fibroblast growth, cellular
signalling, cell-cell adhesion, involvement in vaso-regulation, and increased
levels of antioxidant enzymes [18]. However, excessive and/or unregulated ROS
generation is harmful. The metabolic anomalies of diabetes lead to an
overproduction of mitochondrial superoxide in both large and small artery
endothelial cells as well as in the myocardium due to oxidative stress [19].
According to Oguntibeju, [20], oxidative stress is a mediator of insulin
resistance, which leads to glucose intolerance and the establishment of
diabetes mellitus, favours the development of atherosclerotic complications,
and contributes to the rise in many micro- and macro-vascular complications. Through a variety of mechanisms, including
increased intracellular formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs),
increased expression of the AGEs receptor and its activating ligands,
activation of protein kinase C isoforms, and overactivity of the hexosamine pathway,
hyperglycemia damages tissue [21]. High fatty-acid flux causes oxidative damage
in insulin-sensitive tissues like the muscle, liver, and heart while exposing
non-insulin-sensitive tissues like the eye, kidney, and nervous system to high
circulating glucose and fatty acid levels and, consequently, ROS-induced
diabetic complications [22].
Plant Collection
Four kilogrammes of fresh tubers of Anchomanes difformis plant were collected from a natural habitat at Okpella, Etsako East LGA of Edo State and authenticated in the Department of Botany, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State.
Preparation of Extraction
Extraction was done at the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Lagos state. The fresh tubers of Anchomanes difformis plant were obtained, washed, chopped and air dried for two weeks. The size was reduced with mortar and pestle into fine powder. About 2.0 kg of the powder was extracted with distilled ethanol (7000ml) by soaking for three days with periodic stirring. The samples were filtered with sintered glass funnel to eliminate particles. The filtrates collected were then concentrated using a rotary evaporator to give brownish viscous pastes which were then weighed directly. The aqueous extract was treated the same way, although distilled water (7000ml) was used in place of ethanol. The brownish pastes (both extracts) were kept in the freezer at -21oC prior to use. The yields were 23.6gm and 21.3gm for ethanol and aqueous extracts respectively.
Animal Model
Twenty-four (24) adult male albino rats (Wistar strain) weighing within the ranges of 150–250 g were used for the antidiabetic study. The rats were procured from the Animal House Department, College of Medicine, Ambrose Alli University Ekpoma, Edo State and transferred to the experimental Laboratory at Health Affairs Ventures, Ekpoma, Edo State where they were allowed two (2) weeks of acclimatization, then weighed again and housed in wooden cages with wire-mesh at the top and sides. They were kept under controlled environmental conditions of temperature (28±20C), relative humidity (50±5%) and a twelve-hour light/dark cycle. The animal facility was adequately ventilated. Tap water and feeds (Top Feed) were provided ad libitum throughout the experimental period.
Determination of Antioxidant Activity of Extracts of A. difformis using DPPH
The radical scavenging activities of the plant
extracts against 2, 2-Diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl radical (DPPH) Sigma-Aldrich
were determined by the method of Ohkawa
[23] using UV spectrophotometer at 517 nm [24].
Procedure: Different concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/ml) of the extracts were prepared in methanol (Analytical grade). Vitamin C was used as the antioxidant standard at concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mg/ml. Exactly 1.0 ml of the extract was placed in a test tube, and 3 ml of methanol was added followed by 0.5 ml of 1mM DPPH in methanol and thereafter the absorbance was determined on a UV-Visible spectrophotometer. A blank solution was prepared containing the same amount of methanol and DPPH. The radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following formula.
Calculation: % Inhibition = (Ab - Aa) / Ab X 100
Where Ab is the absorbance of the blank sample (without the extract) and Aa is the absorbance
Of the extract.
Determination of ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay of Anchomanes Difformis
ABTS assay was based on the slightly modified method of Huang [25].
Procedure: ABTS radical cation (ABTS+) was made by reacting 7 mM ABTS solution with 2.45 mM potassium sulphate. The mixture was allowed to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12-16 hrs before use. The ABTS+ solution was concentrated with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. After the addition of 100 ?l of sample or trolox standard to 3.9 ml of diluted ABTS solution, absorbance was read on the spectrophotometer at 734 nm immediately after 6 minutes. Results were expressed as trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC).
ABTS radical cation activity = (A0 - A1) / A0 X 100
Where, A0 is the absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance of the test samples and reference. All the tests were executed in triplicates and the end results were averaged.
Determination of Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity of Root Extract of Anchomanes difformis
The modified method of Halliwell [26] was used for
assay of the scavenging ability of the hydroxyl radicals. Using dilute
deionized water, Stock solutions of EDTA (1 mM), FeCl3 (10 mM), H2O2
(10 mM), Ascorbic Acid (1 mM), and Deoxyribose (10 mM) were made [27].
Procedure: The assay was performed by adding 0.1 ml EDTA, 0.36 ml of deoxyribose 0.01 ml of FeCl3, 0.1 ml H2O2, 1.0 ml of the extract of different concentrations (50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ?g/ml) dissolved in distilled water, 0.33 ml of phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.9), 0.1 ml of ascorbic acid in sequence into a test-tube. The mixture was then incubated at 37oC for 1 hour. 1.0 ml of the incubated mixture was mixed with 1.0 ml of 10% TCA and 1.0 ml of 0.5% TBA (in 0.025 M NaOH containing 0.025% BHA) to develop the pink chromogen measured at 532 nm. The hydroxyl radical scavenging action of the extract is reported as % inhibition of deoxyribose. The degradation is determined by using the subsequent equation.
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity = (A0 - A1) / A0
X 100
Where, A0 is the absorbance of the control and A1 is
the absorbance of the test samples and reference. All the tests were performed
in triplicates and the results were averaged.
Inhibition of Activities of Carbohydrate Digestive Enzymes by Extract of Anchomanes difformis
Alpha-Amylase Inhibition Assay
Alpha-amylase inhibitory ability of the extract was assayed as reported by Kwon [28].
Procedure: Appropriate dilutions of the extract (0 - 500 µL), and 500 µL of 0.02 M sodium phosphate buffer [pH 6.9; containing 0.006 M NaCl and 0.5 mg/mL of porcine pancreas ?-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1)] were incubated at 37 °C for 10 minutes. Thereafter, 500 µL of starch solution (1 % starch in 0.02 M sodium phosphate buffer) was added. The reaction mixture was then incubated at 37 °C for 15 minutes, and the reaction was terminated with 1.0 mL of 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) colour reagent (1 % DNSA and 12 % sodium potassium tartrate, in 0.4 M NaOH). The reaction mixture was then incubated in a boiling water bath for 5 minutes, and cooled to room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm, and the percentage ?-amylase inhibition was then calculated.
Calculation: % Inhibition = (A control- A sample) / A control X 100
Where, A control is the absorbance of the control,A sample is the absorbance of the test sample.
Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay
The ability of the extract to inhibit ?-glucosidase
was determined as reported by Kashtoh & Baek, [29].
Procedure: About 50 ml of B. stearothermophillus ?-glucosidase (0.1 U/mL in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing bovine serum albumin 2000 mg/ml), was pre-incubated with appropriate dilutions of the extract for 15 minutes. Thereafter, 50 µl of 3 mM para-nitrophenylglucopyranoside (PNPG), dissolved in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) was added as a substrate to start the reaction. The reaction mixture was further incubated at 37 °C for 20 minutes, and the reaction was terminated by addition of 2 mL of 0.1 M Na2CO3. The ?-glucosidase activity was determined by measuring the yellow-coloured p-nitrophenol released from PNPG at 400 nm. The percentage ?-glucosidase inhibition was then calculated.
Calculation: % Inhibition = (A control- A sample) / A control X 100
Where, A control is the absorbance of the control,A sample is the absorbance of the test samples
Anti-Diabetic Study
Induction of Diabetes Mellitus
Prior to induction, the experimental animals (rats)
were fasted overnight. A single dose of 60mg/kg body weight of Streptozotocin
(Sigma- Aldrich Corp. St Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in saline solution was
administered intra-peritoneally. After injection, the rats had access to food
and water. The rats that had blood glucose levels of between 250 -300 mg/100ml
after 5 days were selected for the study.
Experimental Design
Plasma activities of Antioxidant Enzymes and MDA Levels of Diabetic Rats 21 Days after Administration of 500mg/Kg Body Weight of Extracts of A. difformis
Feed was withdrawn from the rats and they were fasted overnight but with free access to water. The administration of extracts of A. difformis was performed through the oral route.
Group I: Normal Control rats (NC) + distilled water
Group 11: Diabetic control (DC) received normal feed
and water, daily for 21 days
Group III: Diabetic rats received aqueous extract of
A. difformis at a dose of 500mg/kg body weight plus normal feed, daily for 21
days.
Group IV: Diabetic rats received ethanol extract of A. difformis at a dose of 500mg/kg body weight plus normal feed, daily for 21 days.
Sample Collection
At day 21, blood samples were collected through the saphenous vein into appropriately- labelled lithium heparin bottles for biochemical analyses. Plasma samples were obtained after centrifugation for 5 minutes at 3000 Revolution per Minute (rpm). The plasma obtained was stored frozen at -200 C until the time of analysis.
Catalase (CAT) activity was determined by the method of Claiborne [30,31].
Principle:
The disappearance of peroxide is followed spectrophotometrically at 240 nm. One
enzyme unit decomposes one micromole of H2O2 per minute at 25oC and pH 7.0.
Procedure:
Exactly 50 ?l of sample was mixed with 2.95 ml of 19 mM H2O2 in 50 mM potassium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at room temperature. The decrease in absorbance at
240 nm was monitored for 3 min at 15 sec interval. A unit of the enzyme
activity is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the decomposition of 1
?mol of H2O2 per minute at 25 oC and pH 7.0. Catalase activity was
expressed as U/mg protein.
Determination of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity
SOD activity was assayed according to the method of Suttle
[32], using Randox Laboratories Kit (Cat. No. SD 125) [33].
Principle:
Xanthine oxidase (XOD) oxidizes xanthine to generate superoxide radicals which
react with 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride
(I.N.T.) to form a red formazan dye. The superoxide dismutase activity is then
measured by the degree of inhibition of this reaction. One unit of SOD causes a
50% inhibition of the rate of reduction of INT under the conditions of the
assay.
Procedure: Exactly 30 ?l of sample or standard was mixed with 1000 ?l substrate reagent (containing 0.05 mM xanthine and 0.025 mM 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenol)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride). To this, 150 ?l of xanthine oxidase was added. Then the initial and final absorbance at 505 nm was read after 30 seconds and 3 minutes respectively, against air. Percentage inhibition of standard was plotted against log10 (standard conc. in SOD U/mL), and then the SOD units of sample was estimated from the standard curve
Determination of Glutathione Peroxidase (GSH-Px) Activity
GSH-PX activity was determined following the method of
Kraus and Ganther [34] using Randox Laboratories Kit (Cat No. RS 504) [35].
Principle:
GSH-PX catalyses the oxidation of GSH by cumene hydrperoxide. The GSSH produced
is immediately converted to GSH in the presence of glutathione reductase and
NADPH, with a concomitant oxidation of NADPH to NADP+. The decrease in
absorbance is measured at 340 nm.
Procedure: Exactly 20 ?l of sample was mixed with 1000 ?l of reagent containing (4 mM glutathione, glutathione reductase and 0.34 mM NADPH in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 and 4.3 mM EDTA) and 40 ?l of 0.18 mM cumene hydroperoxide. The initial absorbance at 340 nm against reagent blank was read after 1 minute; then the absorbance was read again after 1 and 2 minutes. One unit of GSH-Px was defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 mM of NADPH per minute at 25 °C. GSH-Px activity was expressed as U/mg protein.
Determination of Plasma Malondialdehyde
The modified method of Gutteridge [36] was used for
the assay [37]
Principle:
MDA in the catabolite of lipid peroxide can react with thiobarbituric acid
(TBA) and produce red compound, which has a maximum absorption peak at 532 nm.
Procedure: Exactly 200 µl of plasma was dispensed into a test tube containing 1000 µl of glacial acetic acid. About 100 µl of 1% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 0.05N NaOH was added to the mixture. The test tube was placed in a boiling water bath for 15 minutes and then allowed to cool. The absorThe modified method of Gutteridge [36] was used for the assay [37]
Principle:
MDA in the catabolite of lipid peroxide can react with thiobarbituric acid
(TBA) and produce red compound, which has a maximum absorption peak at 532 nm.
Procedure:
Exactly 200 µl of plasma was dispensed into a test tube containing 1000 µl of
glacial acetic acid. About 100 µl of 1% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 0.05N NaOH
was added to the mixture. The test tube was placed in a boiling water bath for
15 minutes and then allowed to cool. The absorbance of the red coloured product
formed was read in a spectrophotometer at 532nm against a reagent blank.
MDA content = Abs
sample-
Abs
blank X
[Std] nmol/ml
Abs Std
– Abs blankbance of the red coloured product
formed was read in a spectrophotometer at 532nm against a reagent blank.
MDA content = Abs
sample-
Abs
blank X
[Std] nmol/ml
Abs Std
– Abs blank
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21.0. All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The ANOVA was the chosen Statistical tool. Values were significant at p? 0.05
Results
Plasma activities of Antioxidant Enzymes and MDA Levels of Diabetic Rats 21 Days after Administration of 500mg/Kg Body Weight of Extracts of A. difformis. Figure 1 showed a significant (P<0.05) increase in activities of SOD, GPX and CAT in diabetic rats administered with aqueous extract Group III (3131.40 ± 16.93, 43.00 ± 1.34, 0.88±00) and ethanol extract Group IV (3235±42.10, 47.78±1.52 and 0.88±0.4) when compared with the diabetic control Group II (1903±29.60, 32.97±0.73 and 0.53±0.05) respectively. In Figure 2, there was a progressive and significant (P<0.05) increase in plasma MDA levels of diabetic control rats (Group II) from day 0 to day 21 when compared to the normal control rats (Group I) which showed no significant increase (P>0.05). Significant (P<0.05) reduction was also observed in MDA levels of the treated diabetic rats in groups III and IV.
Key: Values are mean ± standard deviation. Values
(represented as Bar charts) are mean, while error bars are standard
deviations. Values in a group with
different alphabetical superscript are significantly different at P<0.05.
Group I: Normal control rats, Group II: Diabetic control rats, Group III: Diabetic rats plus aqueous extract, Group IV: Diabetic rats plus ethanol extract.
Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant activities of Root Extracts of Anchomanes difformis
In Figure 3, the radical scavenging effect of
extracts of A. difformis and the standard (Vit C) exhibited increases in
percentage inhibition in a dose-dependent manner. The ethanol extract showed
the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity (% inhibition) of 93.62±0.85 at a
concentration of 2.0mg/ml while the standard, vitamin C and aqueous extract
showed % inhibitions of 92.31±0.30 and 91.65±0.41 respectively at 2.0mg/ml
concentration. The scavenging power of the ethanol and aqueous extracts of A.
difformis for ABTS radicals were analysed and compared (Figure 4).
Figure 1: Mean plasma activities of SOD, GPX and CAT of control
and diabetic rats 21 days after administration of 500mg/kg body weight of root
extracts A. difformis.
Figure 2: Mean plasma levels of MDA of controls and diabetic
rats 21 days after administration of 500mg/kg body weight of root extracts of
A. difformis.
Figure 3: Antioxidant capacity of the root extracts of
Anchomanes difformis using DPPH.
Figure 4: ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay of Root Extract of
Achomanes difformis.
Figure 5: Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity of Root Extract
of Anchomanes difformis.
Figure 6: ?- amylase inhibition activity of ethanol and aqueous root extracts of Anchomanes difformis and the Control, Acarbose
Figure 7: ?-glucosidase inhibition activity of ethanol and
aqueous root extracts of Anchomanes difformis and the Control (Acarbose).
The scavenging capacity of the extracts and standard (Trolox) increased with an increase in concentrations. The % inhibition of the standard was 98.1±0.71 at 2.0mg/ml concentration while the % inhibition for ethanol and aqueous extracts were 97.1±0.30 and 96.10±0.70 respectively at same concentration. In Figure 5, both ethanol and aqueous extracts showed strong concentration-dependent scavenging abilities for hydroxyl radicals. The ethanol extract was the most powerful radical scavenger of the hydroxyl radicals, with an inhibition of 85.60% at a concentration of 2-0mg/ml while the aqueous extract demonstrated moderate scavenging abilities (inhibition of up to 67.11% at 2.0mg/ml concentration) when compared to the standard (vitamin C) which exhibited radical scavenging abilities (inhibition) of 84.71% at 2.0mg/ml concentration.
In-Vitro Inhibition of Carbohydrate Digestive Enzymes
In Figure 6, moderate inhibition of alpha amylase activity was observed with IC50 of 5.911 and 6.259 for ethanol and aqueous extracts respectively when compared with the control (acarbose) with IC50 of 4.571. Figure 7 showed that both ethanol and aqueous root extracts of A. difformis significantly inhibited alpha glucosidase activity in a concentration dependent manner as shown by the lower IC50 of 1.323 and 1.656 respectively and better inhibitory activity when compared to the control, Acarbose with IC50 of 5.226. Aqueous A. difformis (IC50=6.259), Ethanol A. difformis (IC50=5.911) and Control (IC50=4.571). Aqueous A. difformis (IC50=1.656), Ethanol A. difformis (IC50=1.323) and Control (IC50=5.226)
Discussion
In our study, we discovered that the extracts of A.
difformis exhibited significant increases in percentage inhibition that are
dose-dependent in their ability to scavenge free radicals. However, the ethanol
extract exhibited higher DPPH radical scavenging activity (inhibition) than
aqueous extract. This result is at variance to those of Faleye et al [10], who
noted a weak antioxidant potential of A. difformis root extract. We also noted
that the ethanol and aqueous extracts of A. difformis for ABTS radicals had
greater scavenging power when concentrations were raised. The extracts'
anti-radical qualities compared favourably with the standard. This result is
consistent with a study by Sivagamasundari. [38], which found that the leaf
extract of Capparis zeylanica had similar effects on free radical scavenging
and antioxidant activity. The flavonoids and phenolic content in the tuber of
A. difformis may be responsible for the plant extracts' ability to scavenge
DPPH and ABTS radicals. According to reports, one of the main groups of
chemicals serving as principal antioxidant free radical terminator or scavenger
are plant phenolics [39]. Both ethanol and aqueous extracts exhibit potent,
concentration-dependent hydroxyl radical scavenging properties. Ethanol extract
demonstrated stronger ability to scavenge hydroxyl radicals than aqueous
extract. According to the study's findings, the ethanol root extract of A.
difformis has outstanding hydroxyl radical scavenging properties. Since
hydroxyl radicals are extremely reactive oxygen species, the human body lacks
an enzyme that can specifically defend against them. This study demonstrates
that the plant's ethanol extract has potent and excellent hydroxyl radical
scavenging properties, making it a potent lipid peroxidation chain reaction
terminator.
The inhibition of the activity of the enzymes that break down carbohydrates (alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase) and delaying the absorption of carbohydrates from the small intestine are two of the principal treatments for diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 [40]. The study's findings, demonstrated that A. difformis root extracts in both ethanol and aqueous forms, significantly inhibited alpha glucosidase activity in a concentration-dependent manner. This is demonstrated by the lower IC50 values and by the extracts' superior inhibitory activity when compared to the standard, acarbose. Moderate suppression of alpha amylase activity was noted in ethanol and aqueous extracts. This finding is consistent with that of Faleye, [10] who found that the alpha amylase activity was mildly inhibited by root extracts of A. difformis. Diabetes mellitus is commonly managed with acarbose. It can prevent the conversion of polysaccharides to monosaccharides by gastro-intestinal glucosidase, which delays the absorption of glucose and reduces postprandial hyperglycaemia. Alpha glucosidase is strongly inhibited by the ethanol and aqueous extracts of A. difformis, but very slightly by alpha amylase. The presence of flavonoids and phenolic compounds in root extracts, as well as their robust capacity to scavenge free radicals as shown by the DPPH, ABTS, and Hydroxyl radical scavenging assays, may be responsible for the inhibitory impact. In their respective research, Nemzer, [41], and Proença, [42] highlighted those flavonoids and phenolic compounds are efficient inhibitors of alpha glucosidase and alpha amylase activities. So, with minimal to no adverse effects, the root extract of A. difformis could be employed as an anti-diabetic medication to treat postprandial hyperglycaemia. This result is consistent with a study by Etsassala, [43], which found that an ethanol extract of Orthosiphontamineus had similar effects on the activities of alpha glucosidase and alpha amylase. We also noted in this study that treatment of diabetic rats with A. difformis extracts both aqueous and ethanol, significantly (p<0.05) improved the activities of the antioxidant enzymes SOD, GPX and CAT when compared to the untreated diabetic rats. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be the cause for the decreased SOD and CAT activities in the diabetic control Group II. In diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia can easily inactivate antioxidant enzymes like SOD, CAT, and GPX by glycating these proteins and causing oxidative stress, which in turn leads to lipid peroxidation [44,45]. Decreased levels of antioxidant enzymes and increased levels of lipid peroxidation have been well documented in induced diabetes. In the enzymatic antioxidant defence system, SOD is one of the key enzymes that scavenges superoxide radicals by converting them to H2O2 and molecular oxygen. The observed decrease in SOD activity in Group II diabetic control rats could be the result of the inactivation by H2O2 or glycosylation of the enzymes which have been reported to occur in diabetes. H2O2 is eliminated by GPX and CAT [46,47]. The enhanced CAT activity in treatment Groups III and IV may be related to increased H2O2 generation. It is possible that increased CAT activity which in turn would protect SOD inactivation by H2O2, would cause an increase in SOD activity. Increase in SOD activity would protect GPX and CAT against inactivation by superoxide anions [48,49]. The decrease in antioxidant enzyme activity in diabetic control Group II and an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity in the treatment Groups obtained in this study, are consistent with the reports of Zhang [46] and Amevor [47].
The plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), a by-product of
fatty acid peroxidation and an index of assessing oxidative damage, is used to
detect lipid peroxidation. In this study, we observed that the plasma MDA
levels in the diabetic control rats increased gradually and significantly
(p<0.05) from day 0 to day 21 when compared to the normal control rats,
which exhibited no significant increase (p>0.05). This result is consistent
with the findings of Omolaoye [50], who in their investigation found that
diabetic rats had significantly higher MDA levels. MDA concentrations were
significantly (p<0.05) reduced after STZ-induced diabetic rats in Groups III
and IV were given aqueous and ethanol extracts of A. difformis. This study's
observation of lower MDA levels is a result of decreased lipid peroxidation.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced during hyperglycaemia, which leads
to oxidative damage and the emergence of diabetic complications [51]. MDA and
other extremely reactive aldehydes are produced when lipids are peroxidised.
MDA has been shown to be a key indicator of oxidative stress and lipid damage
caused by free radicals [37]. Significant alterations in lipid metabolism and
structure have been linked to diabetes, particularly in patients with vascular
complications, according to Eid, [52]. The development of diabetes
complications may be influenced by peroxidative injury, according to the
increased level of MDA in diabetics. As seen in diabetic control (Group II),
the rise in lipid peroxidation may also be a sign of decline in the defence
mechanism of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. It has been noted that
diabetic subjects have plasma or serum elevated MDA levels [53,54]. According to
Ito, [55], lipid peroxidation in diabetics causes a variety of secondary
complications, such as arteriosclerosis and brain diseases. In hyperglycemic
mice, Li, [56], found increased lipid peroxidation measured by MDA and
connected it to the development of myocardial infarction. As a result of
increased lipid peroxidation by ROS in the ocular membrane system, diabetic
retinopathy and cataracts are the most common causes of irreversible
micro-vascular complications [57,58]. The aqueous and ethanol extracts free
radical scavenging potentials of this plant, as well as the phytochemical
components of A. difformis, whose antioxidant effects contribute to protecting
membrane lipid against peroxidation, may be responsible for the reduction in
MDA levels after extracts of the root of A. difformis were administered to
diabetic rats in Groups III and IV. According to multiple studies [50,59,60],
glucose-lowering herbs decreased MDA levels in STZ or Alloxan-induced diabetic
rats. By giving this plant extract to diabetic rats, it may lessen oxidative
damage to organs, particularly pancreatic cells, so improving those cells'
functioning and defending against diabetic complications.
This study shows that Anchomanes difformis tuber extracts have anti-diabetic properties. The plant extract's ability to suppress the activities of the carbohydrate-digesting enzymes (?-amylase and ?-glucosidase) is also responsible for the plant's anti-diabetic potentials. According to the study, the plant's root extract is effective at scavenging free radicals, terminating lipid peroxidation, and quenching reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are linked to the pathophysiology of numerous diseases.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the management of the Department of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, and Edo State Nigeria for creating the enabling environment for this study. Thanks to all the Laboratory and technical staff of St Kenny Diagnostic and Research Centre, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria for their excellent assistance and for providing medical writing support/editorial support in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines.
Disclosure of Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and the writing of the paper.
Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Availability of Data and Materials
The authors declare consent for all available data present in this study.
Authors’ Contribution
The entire study procedure was conducted with the involvement of all writers.
Statement of informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual
participants included in the study.