Article Type : Research Article
Authors : Mohammed AAO
Keywords : Hepatitis B virus; ICT; ELISA; Prevalence; UMST; Khartoum-Sudan
Hepatitis
Hepatitis: means inflammation of the liver cells (hepatocyte),
also it refers to group of viral infections that affect the liver [1].
Aetiology
of hepatitis: Hepatitis is caused by variety of a
common viral hepatitis (A, B, C, D, and E). Other viruses which causes
hepatitis are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Autoimmune
condition, drugs and /or chemicals as alcohol overuse may also causes acute
hepatitis that is similar to the viral one [2].
Signs
and symptoms of HBV infection: The clinical
features of acute hepatitis B are indistinguishable from that of other types of
acute viral hepatitis. And most children under ages 5 years are asymptomatic,
where as 30%-50% of persons ?5 years have initial signs and symptoms which
include Fever, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, dark urine and
joint pain. Persons with chronic HBV infection might be asymptomatic, have no
evidence of liver disease [3].
Types
of hepatitis
Viral hepatitis: some viruses may causes hepatitis
although they are common known to causes other disease including (CMV, EBV). While
others are the main causative agent of hepatitis such as:
·
Hepatitis A: its cause
by hepatitis A virus (infectious hepatitis)
·
Hepatitis B: cause by
hepatitis B virus (serum hepatitis)
·
Hepatitis C: cause by
hepatitis C virus (none A, non B hepatitis)
·
Hepatitis D: cause by
hepatitis D virus (Delta agent)
·
Hepatitis E: cause by
hepatitis E virus
There is evidence of the existence of hepatitis G.
Hepatitis G virus is a flavivirus, like HCV to which it is closely related.
Non-viral hepatitis: this cause due to some autoimmune status, chemicals and
drugs [4].
Hepatitis
B
Hepatitis B is an enveloped virus composed of
double-stranded DNA, enclosed within a nucleocapsid core (HBcAg) surrounded by
an outer lipoprotein envelope into which the surface antigen (HBsAg) is
embedded. A third antigen, HBeAg, is soluble and usually released from liver
cells with active HBV infection. When detected indicates a high degree of
infectivity. However, in some people a mutation in the HBV genome results in
failure to produce HBeAg, so HBV genome may be highly infectious but HBeAg
negative. Measurement of HBV DNA levels is thus a more reliable [5].
Pathogenesis:
Hepatitis B virus can cause acute or
chronic, symptomatic or a symptomatic disease. When HBV inter the blood it
spread to the liver, start to replicate in hepatocyte within (3 – 45) days or
more depending on the infectious dose, route of entry (direct intravenous
injection is more serious) and person immune status . The hepatitis B virus is
not cytopathic, and liver injury in chronic hepatitis B is believed to be
immunologically mediated [6].
Acute
infection: Most acute Hepatitis B virus (HBV)
infections in adult’s results in complete recovery, with minor symptoms
appeared as Jaundice, fever and enzyme release. Detection of HBeAg component of
the virion in blood indicates the existence of the active infection. HBsAg
continue to be released in -to blood even after virion release has ended and
till resolves of infection (about 6 months later). However it may promote
hypersensitivity reaction due to HBsAg immune complexes and antibody [7-11].
Chronic
infection: (It is the major source of spread
of disease). Insufficient T-cell can lead to chronic infection which occur in
about 5-10% of adult people with HBV infection. That is why 90% of infected
infants become chronic carriers (immature thymus). Also virus may make minimal
cytopathic effect (CPE) when infection proceed for relatively long time without
liver damage, during this viral genome integrated to hepatocyte chromatin and
remain latent. Persons with chronic infection are often asymptomatic and may
not be aware that they are infected, however can infect others that why they
referred to them as carriers. Chronic hepatitis may develop to cirrhosis and
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Chronic infection is responsible for most
HBV-related mortality.
Transmission
and epidemiology: Despite availability of
an effective vaccine, still HBV is a major health problem. It has average
incubation period of 2-3 month. Word wide it’s estimated to cause more than
million deaths a year from its chronic effect. According to the CDC
approximately, one in 20 people in the U.S.A is infected by HBV. About 5% of
people infected by HBV get a chronic infection and there are more than one
million Americans with chronic hepatitis. Hepatitis B virus considered to be
the second cause of liver failure in Sudan. In developing countries, because of
lack of awareness of the risk of disease, poor sterilization, economics and
ignorance or lack of many public health educational programs are the main
factors in it is prevalence. Hepatitis B virus transmitted by blood and blood
products. Also it can transmit by saliva, serum, vaginal secretion and all
other body fluid. The ratio of virus in blood related to other body fluid is
about 1:1000 times. So high risk groups for HBV infection are [12-15]:
·
People from endemic regions (china, part of Africa, Alaska...etc.).
·
Babies of mother with chronic HBV infection.
·
Intravenous drugs abusers.
·
People with multiple sex partners (homosexual and heterosexual).
·
Haemodialysis and other patients requiring blood and its products.
·
health care personnel and staff members of mentally retarded
institutions [5,8].
Figure 1 Shows Transmissions and body immune response to HBV. Injection into blood, replicate, viremia also transmission to various body secretion where other individual can infect. Symptoms are cases by CMI and immune complexes between HBsAg and antibody (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Transmissions and body immune response to HBV infection (8).
response to HBV infection (8).
Laboratory
diagnosis
Hepatitis B Diagnosis usually done by serological
detection of hepatitis B markers antigens, (Ag) and/or antibodies (Ab) in the
blood by ELISA and ICT (screening) technique. Serological markers vary
depending on whether the infection is acute or chronic. Different serological
markers testing are used whether for diagnosing or identifying the stage of
disease as well immunity to HBV infection, these are [16]:
HBsAg
(hepatitis B surface antigen): is first
serological marker to appear and can be detected in an infected blood average
of 4 weeks (range: 1-6 weeks) after exposure to the virus and it is presence is
indicative of an active infection regardless of whether the infection is acute
or chronic. In order to differentiate them IgM anti-HBc is necessary to be
test. HBsAg is an antigen used in hepatitis B vaccine [17].
IgM
Anti-HBc: is often detectable at the time of
clinical onset, and decline to not detectable levels within 6 months. It is
diagnostic marker for acute hepatitis B infection, useful for differentiating
recent infection from chronic carrier.
Total
anti-HBc: (combination of IgM and IgG) is
detectable in serum by the onset of clinical illness and persists for many
years, in both how have cleared the hepatitis B virus and those become chronic
carriers. In patient with chronic hepatitis B both HBsAg and total anti-HBsAg usually
remain detectable for life [18].
Anti-HBsAg:
Anti-HBsAg titres rise slowly after the disappearance of HBsAg in patient who
does not progress to chronic infection. It generally indicates recovery and
immunity from infection or previous active vaccination. There is a time
interval of weeks to several months between the disappearance of detectable
HBsAg and appearance of anti-HBsAg, only anti-HBc is detectable during this
time which referred as (core window or second window). Anti-HBsAg also develops
in a person who has been vaccinated against hepatitis B [19].
HBeAg:
(hepatitis B e antigen) appears few days after HBsAg be detectable and
disappear before it’s gone, although it might persist for years in chronic
carriers. Despite not necessary to be test, its presence indicates increase
risk of infectivity.
Anti-HBeAg:
appears at about the time that HBsAg
disappears. It generally indicates a good prognosis, and the risk of
infectivity and transmission is reduced. Anti-HBeAg present in 50%-75% of
patients with chronic hepatitis B infection.
HBsAg:
is the most commonly used test for
diagnosing acute infection or detecting carriers. Chronic infection can be
distinguished by Finding of HBsAg and lack of detectable antibody to this
antigen and IgM –anti-HBc antibody [20].
The
window period of HBV infection
The “Window Period” is the period when a person is infected with HBV but prior to the appearance of detectable HBsAg. HBsAg appears an average of 4 weeks after exposure and may decline to undetectable levels within 4-6 months if the infection is resolved (second window). Figure 2 shows the window period of HBsAg detection in acute phase and in case of recovery. Blood Products Advisory Committee (Figure 2).
Figure 2: The window period of HBsAg detection in acute phase and in case of recovery [24].HBV DNA is the first markers appear in plasma (0-40 days) during infection. Some infected blood may be transfused if it is donated during the window period so more advanced techniques such as PCR for detecting HB virus DNA are needed to resolve any doubt in the clinical profile of at risk donors even when ELISA test is negative. Also permits earlier detection of HBV infection in the donors resulting in earlier notification, follow-up, medical intervention and prevention of secondary transmission [21].
Treatment
and prevention
Treatment:
HBV only treatment for acute infections
is Supportive care with high carbohydrate /high protein diet to repair damaged
liver cells. Chronic patients may be given anti-viral drugs as alpha-interferon.
Drug called adefovir dipivoxil (nucleotide antilog) or Lamivudine, all can help
in stop viral replication and prevent liver damage in many cases; none of the
drugs considered curative. Liver transplantation is often a final option in treatment.
Prevention:
Comprehensive strategy to eliminate
hepatitis B virus was recommended in (1990-CDC) which include:
·
Precautions and
prenatal testing of pregnant women for HBsAg to identify new-borns who require
prevention from prenatal infections. Infant of HBsAg positive mothers should be
given hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and hepatitis B vaccine as close as
possible to birth. HBIG can only be given up to 10 days after delivery.
·
Screening blood before
transfusion.
·
Effective Vaccine
recommended and available which provide protection to about 95% for those
receiving 3doses.
1. Routine
vaccination of infants.
2. Vaccination
of adolescents.
3. Vaccination
of adults at high risk for infection.
4. Further
Vaccination of adults at increased risk for HBV infection (those in endemic
areas) was published 2006 [22].
·
Social awareness and
health education, the abundant of circulating virus is high and the minimal
dose is low that is such simple practices as sharing toothbrush or razors can
transmit the infection.
Study was conducted at Al-Rehman medical laboratory
with ELISA (3red generation) for HBsAg detection to 200 blood samples. Seven
cases (3.5%) out of 200 were positive with ELISA. One of the seven was ICT
negative, while all other six were also ICT positive, they concluded that low
sensitivity of ICT in comparison to ELISA.
Retrospective study published by European journal of
Epidemiology in Turkey Red Crescent Centres on population over sixteen years
blood donors between 1989 and 2004 for HBV and HCV, HBsAg detection and HCV
antibody detection, the overall prevalence was 4.19% for HBsAg and 0.38% for
HCV antibody during the study period -1989 [15]. The sero-positivity of
Hepatitis B virus was done by Perpetua E N. for a total of 3446 (295 were found
to be positive) donors who were attended the blood bank of OLA Catholic
Hospital, Oluyoro Ibadan, Nigeria; and screened for Hepatitis B virus between
January 2007 to December 2011 using Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) ELISA
to determine the prevalence of HBsAg. The seropositivity of Hepatitis B virus
infection was found to be 8.56%. It is concluded that the Seroprevalence of
Hepatitis B in this region is high according to the global patterns of
transmission although it’s reduced base on previous studies. Another Study done
in Kamothe, Navi Mumbai- India, to Check the Specificity & Sensitivity of ICT
with ELISA, this study show that show that 2-5% of adult population are HBV
positive amongst 135 randomly selected patients, 50 positive and 85 negative by
rapid diagnostic test (ICT). It was observed that in comparison with ELISA,
rapid ICT test had 94.2% sensitivity (3 false negative) and 97.61% specificity
(2 false positive). Sero-prevalence of HBsAg also carried by Ado A, etal. On
Shika, Zaria, Kaduna-Nieria blood donors in June 2008 using HBsAg latex. Thus
study show that high prevalence was observed between 30-39 years (26.7%) no
prevalence was observed between 15-19 years and 45-54 with highest in male
(86.7%) compared to female (13.3%). Ali aduo M A, Saeed Ali Y A. conducted a
study during the period from May to July 2007, in the city of Nyala using ICT
and confirmed with 3red generation ELISA.
(2 false negative) ICT results for HBsAg detection were observed. The seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the possible risk factors among blood donors in Nyala, South Dar Fur State of western Sudan for a total of 400 male blood donors, (6.25%) were found reactive for HBsAg. The highest seroprevalence (30.8%) was found between 19-24 and 37-42 years of age. Unprotected sexual activities (20%) was the Most apparent predisposing risk factor, followed by razor sharing (13.3%), parenteral drug injections (10%), history of migration to Egypt and alcoholism (6.6%), tattooing and surgical procedures (3.3%), where (36.6%) were not aware for their condition. Serum alanine aminotansferase (ALT) was elevated in (30.7%) of HBV seroreactors.3. In comparing ICT with ELISA shown that (2 false negative) i.e. low ICT sensitivity which rely on that short incubation tests do not detect low affinity or low concentration of antibodies.3. Another study (cross-sectional) conducted by Mudawi H, et al. Dec 2000 was aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on the population of Um Zukra village in Gezira state of Central Sudan. The participants were interviewed for risk factors of viral hepatitis. Blood samples were then collected and tested for HBsAg. A total of 404 subjects were screened (ICT) with a mean age of 35 years; 54.9% were females, HBsAg were reactive in 6.9% of the studied population. Exposure to HBV increased with increasing age. The only significant risk factor for transmission of infection was a history of parenteral antischistosomal therapy. In another study done Nigeria among blood donors (175) of age 20-40 years and HIV Infected patients 490 (age 17-60years) Twenty-five (14.3%) and 127 (25.9%) of blood donors and HIV patients respectively were found to be reactive to HBsAg, with the male (14.6%) slightly higher than female (12.9%), and highest rate between 51-60 years (44%) followed by 31-40 of ages (28.2%). Result show high endemicity of HBV infection in Jos-Nigeria (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3: Show ICT test results.
General
objectives: To determine the prevalence of HBV
among blood donors in Khartoum state.
Specific objectives: To detect HBsAg in serum of donors in Khartoum state. To compare the ICT test sensitivity and specificity with ELISA. To estimate the level of awareness and the significance of the society education with health programs and vaccine. To detect seropositivity of HBsAg among different Age groups.
Figure 4: ELISA results.
Justification:
Hepatitis B is one of the blood born
disease and despite availability of it’s an effective vaccine still considered
a major health problem. Worldwide 2 billion have been infected and 350million
will develop chronic effect. In developing countries, expose to contaminated
therapeutic equipment are common in many setting also because of lack of
awareness of infection control practices, poor sterilization, economics, and
ignorance of many health programs as (vaccination). Most asymptomatic carriers
may not be aware that they are infected, however they can infect others, hence
this study is aimed to determine the prevalence of HBV in blood donors and
estimate social awareness also ensure ICT sensitivity and specificity comparing
to ELISA as the gold standard technique.
Study
design and Study area
A descriptive analytic hospital based study conducted
in Khartoum teaching hospital Blood Bank in Khartoum State, Sudan. Ethical
clearance was obtained from SUMASRI ethical review board.
Study
population
Included all voluntary male blood donors who were
eligible for blood donation according to Khartoum blood bank policy, after
receiving agreement to participate in the study.
Study
sample
Atonal of 90 randomly selected blood samples were
collected from the study subject then received at microbiology lab (virology)
for testing of HBsAg.
Selection
criteria
Inclusion
Criteria: Eligibility for blood donation. Valid
consent from the donor for participation in the study.
Exclusion
Criteria: Initial refusal of the donor to
participate in the research. Excuse of the donor to not fill some required data
or his own decision to terminate participation.
Specimen’s
collection
Blood were collected by venepuncture and immediately
2.5 ml from each sample were delivered in to a sterile, clean dry blood
container without anti-coagulant (plain). The containers were left for
30minutes on the bench at room temperature for the blood to clot. Then
centrifuged the clotted blood at 3000rpm for ten minutes to separate sera. The
harvested sera for each specimen labelled within two hours of collection and
stored at 4C. Serum samples initially tested for HBsAg by ELISA (AMS-U.K). Data
were analyzed by Microsoft statistical package for social sciences (SPSS).
Samples then restored at -20C and tested with ICT (Biorex) two weeks later in
(Alrybat hospital blood bank.
Enzyme
link immune-sorbent assay
Principle: The method used was
an Enzyme link immune-sorbent assay, for qualitative HBsAg detection in human
serum or plasma. Based on the principle of antibody sandwich using polystyrene
micro- well strips pr-coated with monoclonal antibodies specific to HBsAg,
during incubation with sample the specific immune complex formed if HBsAg
presence in the sample (serum), which captured on the solid phase. After
washing to removed excess serum protein, second antibody conjugated with the
enzyme peroxidase (HRP-enzyme) and directed against HBsAg is added in to the wells.
During second incubation steps these conjugated antibodies will be bound to any
complexes formed previously (first step), and unbound conjugated antibody then
removed by washing , chromogen solutions containing tetramethyle-benzidine(TMP)
and urea peroxide add in the presence of antibody-antigen antibody(HRP) ``
sandwich`` the colourless chromogen is hydrolysed to blue colour product which
turn yellow after stopping the reaction with sulfuric acid. The amount of
colour intensity can be measured and it’s proportional to the amount of antigen
captured in the well and sample respectively. Wells containing samples negative
for HBsAg remain colourless.
Interpretation
of result
Negative
result: Tests given an optical density less than
the cut-of value (0.151) were considered negative (no reactive) (Table 1).
Positive result: Samples given optical density greater than or equal to the cut-of value (0.151) considered reactive (indicated that HBsAg detected with this ELISA test) (11-AMS). All steps and work were done following the instructions of the manufacture company (see appendix) with its quality control steps. Storage of kit was considered. The results were read and recorded also revised with virology lab supervisor.
Table 1: Summary of ELISA assay procedure.
Added sample diluents |
20Ml |
Added sample |
100Ml |
Incubate (first ) |
60 minutes |
Added HRP-conjugate |
50Ml |
Second incubation |
30minutes |
Washed |
5 times |
Coloring solution added |
50ML(A)+ 50Ml(B) |
Incubated |
30minutes |
Reaction stopped (sulfuric acid) |
50 ML stop solution |
Absorbance readied at |
450/630nm |
The tests absorbance was readed in spectrophotometer and calculated
the cut –of value, then final results interpreted.
|
Cut-of value=*Nc*2.1 *Nc= the mean absorbance value for three negative control. |
Table 2: Absorbance reading –El-10170H (A to H).
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
2-1 |
0.045 |
0.042 |
1.834 |
1.748 |
0.026 |
0.027 |
0.026 |
0.028 |
2-2 |
0.029 |
0.025 |
0.026 |
0.024 |
0.026 |
0.027 |
0.024 |
0.065 |
2-3 |
0.028 |
2.66 |
0.022 |
2.014 |
0.022 |
0.028 |
0.021 |
0.233 |
2-4 |
0.027 |
0.028 |
0.022 |
0.022 |
0.020 |
0.024 |
0.018 |
0.024 |
2-5 |
0.027 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.024 |
1.317 |
0.023 |
0.029 |
2-6 |
0.030 |
0.028 |
0.022 |
0.023 |
0.027 |
0.022 |
0.055 |
0.025 |
2-7 |
0.023 |
0.021 |
0.030 |
0.022 |
0.021 |
0.020 |
0.170 |
0.031 |
2-8 |
0.029 |
0.027 |
0.025 |
1.947 |
2.078 |
0.023 |
0.022 |
0.029 |
2-9 |
0.026 |
0.022 |
0.020 |
0.163 |
0.028 |
0.021 |
0.022 |
0.025 |
2-10 |
0.024 |
0.027 |
1.050 |
0.021 |
0.021 |
0.020 |
0.021 |
0.024 |
2-11 |
0.022 |
0.023 |
0.019 |
0.020 |
0.029 |
0.023 |
0.024 |
0.029 |
2-12 |
0.026 (blank) |
0.022 (N.C) |
0.025 (N.C) |
0.025 (N.C) |
1.632 (P.C) |
1.630 (P.C) |
0.020 |
0.022 |
A
(2-12)=blank. B
(2-12), C (2-12), D (2-12) =negative control. E (2-12), F (2-12) =positive control. Underlined
reading = positive samples -Cut-of
value =0.022+0.025+0.025 *2.1 =0.072* 2.1= 0.151 |
Immune
chromatography test (ICT)
Principle:
HBsAg rapid test device (serum /plasma)
is qualitative test for HBsAg detection. the membrane coated with anti HBsAg
–antibody on the test and line region of the device, during testing specimens
react with anti-HBsAg conjugated-antibody particles the mixture migrate (by
capillary action) upward on the membrane chromatography to react with
anti-HBsAg antibodies on the membrane and generate a coloured line. The
presence of this coloured line indicated appositive result (two line test and
control).
ICT - procedure: 50 ML serum sample was pipette by sterile pipette and dispensed in to the specimen well(s) of test device(s). Results were interpreted within 15 minutes. (No interpreted test last for more than 30 minutes). In case of no colour appear in control line the test was considered invalid then repeated. Procedural and its quality control included as manufacturer’s instructions.
Table 3: Showing results of both ELISA and ICT (n=90).
ELISA | ||||
Positive |
Negative |
Total | ||
ICT |
positive |
9 (TP) |
1 (FP) |
10 |
Negative |
2 (FN) |
78 (TN) |
80 | |
Total |
11 |
79 |
90 | |
Table 4: Showing validity of ICT test compared to ELISA.
Sensitivity |
81.8% |
Specificity |
98.7% |
positive predictive value (PPV) |
90% |
Negative predictive value (PNV) |
97.5% |
Table 5: Shows Hepatitis B and vaccination awareness.
|
Have Knowledge about HBV |
Have no Knowledge about HBV |
Have Knowledge about HBV vaccine |
Have no Knowledge about HBV vaccine |
Vaccinated |
Frequency |
27 |
63 |
18 |
72 |
6 |
Percent |
30% |
70% |
20% |
80% |
6.7% |
Result
interpretation
Positive
result: Two distinct coloured lines appear.
Negative
result: Only one colour appears (control line
only).
Ethical
consideration
Formal Ethical Clearance
from Sudan Medical and Scientific Research Institute (SUMASRI) and
participant’s consents were obtained, also acceptance of the hospital authority
(see appendices). The remaining of the blood and waste products were treated
appropriately and safely disposed (Table 2).
Results
of ELISA compared to ICT
Eleven serum samples (12.2%) out of 90 were positive
by ELISA and 79 negative, ten were ICT positive (80 negative). Same nine sample
that given positive by ELISA were also ICT positive; plus other one that
already ELISA (-ve), while two were negative by ICT which ELISA positive (Table
3).
·
Sensitivity % = true
positive / (true positive + false negative)*100
·
Specificity% = true
negative / (true negative +false positive)*100
·
Positive predictive value
(PPV) %= (true positive /total positive)*100
·
Negative predictive
value (PNV) %= (true negative /total negative) *100
·
Although ICT was
specific in detecting HBsAg (98.7%), but has low sensitivity (81.8%) (Table 4).
High prevalence was on age group of 20-30 (62.2%)
and 31-40 (30%) years. where was less in the age below the 20 years (2.2%) (Figure
5).
Only 27 out of 90
individuals were had knowledge with hepatitis B and 63(70%) were lack
information about it. Most of the studied population don’t knows if there is
vaccine to hepatitis B or no these about 72 of them (80%) and 6 (6.7%) only
vaccinated against hepatitis B (Table 5).
12.2% is the prevalence of hepatitis B among blood donors in Khartoum-Sudan that submitted by this research, this indicate high hepatitis B prevalence in this area (high endemicity). The prevalence of hepatitis B infection is high if compared with previous studies conducted in Gezira state-central Sudan (6.9%), Nyala-south Darfur (6.25%) (Both were intermediate) also higher than Nigeria 8.9%, Turkey 4.19%, India 5% and Pakistan 3.5%. May due to unprotected sexual practices, drug injections and illegal immigrants from endemic countries, hence only donor were health related and all were negative as well all individual receiving previous donation were also negative this exclude expose to contaminated equipment and poor sterilization from the expected prevalence factors.
Figure 5: Showing distribution of positive HBsAg among different age groups.
Figure 6: ICT device show positive result – Copy.
High hepatitis B prevalence was seen among mean of age groups (20-30 years) which is near to those in Nyala (19-24 years) although with different parentages 62%, 30% respectively. Whenever elevations in youth (20-30years) with no clear reasons of contact to blood; seropositivity could be associated with sexual practice and drug injection among Sudanese in their third decade of life. ICT (Biorex) results has shown less sensitivity 81.8% (2 false negative) as in previous studies (false 1 negative) for Acon-USA, 3 false negative 94% sensitivity and (2 false negative). This indicate low ICT sensitivity comparable to ELISA for detection very low amount of HBsAg. Only (30%) out of 90 donors have knowledge about hepatitis B and most of them lack knowledge about hepatitis B vaccine. Only (6.7%) were vaccinated and these numbers indicate that population are in need of general health education [20-23].
Figure 7: Donor Consent form.
HBV infection became endemic in Khartoum city, with
even higher percent than other parts of Sudan like Gezira, Nyala. It is common
among 20-30 years age group. May be associated with sexual practices and
injection drug users. Culturally female do not donate blood in Sudan. ICT
should not be considered as final screening test in donation blood, even in
emergency case there is about 2% infected blood may be transfused. No community
health education programs and hence low population awareness concerning hepatitis
[24].
Screening blood for transfusion should be done by
ELISA method. Social health educational programs should be promote by different
health sectors to reduce new infection and transmission rate. Hepatitis B
vaccine schedule in Sudan should extend to adult rather than children alone and
rural must covered. More researches should be carrying out by authorized
governmental heath bodies with large sample size to confirm this result
including the predisposing risk factors. And may exclude and/or list the
standard ICT companies, especially for transfusion purposes (Figures 6 and 7).
·
Micropipettes
(automated).
·
Incubator
·
Washer
·
Spectrophotometer
(reader)
·
Commercially available
test kit containing solid phase support system, -reagent, control.
·
Distilled water
·
Gloves
·
70% alcohol and cotton
·
Commercially HBsAg
devices, reagents.
·
Safety pox
·
Blood container
·
HBsAg ICT devices.
·
Flask
·
Papers
Calculator
ICT: Immuonochromatography Test; ELISA:
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; CMV:
Cytomegalovirus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; DNA: De-oxy ribonucleic acid; HBcAg:
Hepatitis B core Antigen; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface Antigen; HBeAg: Hepatitis
B e Antigen; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; CPE: Cytopathic effect; HCC:
Hepatocellular carcinoma; CDC: Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, USA;
CMI: Cell mediated immunity; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; HBIG: Hepatitis B
immunoglobulin